Literature DB >> 19626442

A step-wise approach for transfer of immunogenicity assays during clinical drug development.

Suzanna Tatarewicz1, Michael Moxness, Dohan Weeraratne, Lei Zhou, Michael Hale, Steven J Swanson, Narendra Chirmule.   

Abstract

We designed a three-step statistical approach to transfer bioanalytical assays (ELISA and Biacore) which evaluates the (1) average equivalence between the two labs (2) concordance in individual sample results between the two labs, and (3) long-term stability of assay performance. Each experimental design evaluated the contribution of four critical variables to the overall variability. Two lots of each variable were examined in a controlled experiment. The variables tested for ELISA were analyst, plate washer, biotinylated-therapeutic protein, and streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase; and for Biacore were analyst, instrument, chip lot, and conjugation chemistry reagent lots. Equivalence in the mean signal to noise (S/N) or mean relative units (RU) between the two labs was established through statistical evaluation of the assay performance characteristics across multiple assay variables. Concordance between the two labs in the individual sample results was subsequently verified both quantitatively and qualitatively. The long-term maintenance of assay stability was monitored by performance testing of a predefined set of samples which were prepared in sufficient quantities to last several years. The process of method validation for biomarker testing in clinical trials is to analyze the variability of the assay performance. However, different factors contribute to this variability and need to be evaluated when the method is transferred to another site/lab. Lack of understanding the critical variables can potentially result in unexpected problems and delays. The three-step statistical approach of assay transfer provides a robust process for transferring complex biological assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19626442      PMCID: PMC2758123          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-009-9130-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  6 in total

1.  Analytical method transfer: new descriptive approach for acceptance criteria definition.

Authors:  Gérald de Fontenay
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.935

2.  Statistical assessment of analytical method transfer.

Authors:  Jinglin Zhong; Kathy Lee; Yi Tsong
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Design and analysis of analytical method transfer studies.

Authors:  James R Schwenke; Dennis K O'Connor
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparing ELISA and surface plasmon resonance for assessing clinical immunogenicity of panitumumab.

Authors:  James A Lofgren; Sripriya Dhandapani; Jason J Pennucci; Christina M Abbott; Daniel T Mytych; Arunan Kaliyaperumal; Steven J Swanson; Michael C Mullenix
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 5.422

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.