BACKGROUND: The presence of Y-chromosome material in patients with Turner syndrome (TS) is a risk factor for the development of gonadoblastoma. Cytogenetic analysis detects Y-chromosome mosaicism in about 5% of Turner patients. However, if Y-chromosome sequences are present in only a few cells, they may be missed by routine analysis. The use of molecular techniques to detect the presence of Y-chromosome fragments in such patients is becoming increasingly important. AIM: The objective of our study was to analyze cryptic Y-chromosome derivatives in Hungarian TS patient population by real-time PCR (RT-PCR). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cytogenetic and RT-PCR methods were used to examine peripheral blood DNA of 130 Hungarian patients with TS for the presence of Y-chromosome. With RT-PCR, 4 regions throughout the Y-chromosome were analyzed. RESULTS: Initial cytogenetic karyotyping assessing 10-50 metaphases revealed 3 patients with Y-chromosome positivity. RT-PCR revealed further 6 patients with Y-chromosome, who were initially considered as Y-negatives by standard kayotyping. The consecutive cytogenetic analysis of a large number (about 100) of metaphases (in 5 patients) and/or FISH (in 6 patients) however, also confirmed the presence of the Y-chromosome in these patients. Prophylactic gonadectomy was carried out in all 9 patients and 1 of them was diagnosed as having bilateral gonadoblastoma without clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a routine molecular screening for hidden Y-chromosome sequences in Turner patients, who are negative for Y-chromosome by conventional cytogenetic analysis, in order to calculate the future risk of developing gonadoblastoma.
BACKGROUND: The presence of Y-chromosome material in patients with Turner syndrome (TS) is a risk factor for the development of gonadoblastoma. Cytogenetic analysis detects Y-chromosome mosaicism in about 5% of Turner patients. However, if Y-chromosome sequences are present in only a few cells, they may be missed by routine analysis. The use of molecular techniques to detect the presence of Y-chromosome fragments in such patients is becoming increasingly important. AIM: The objective of our study was to analyze cryptic Y-chromosome derivatives in Hungarian TS patient population by real-time PCR (RT-PCR). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cytogenetic and RT-PCR methods were used to examine peripheral blood DNA of 130 Hungarian patients with TS for the presence of Y-chromosome. With RT-PCR, 4 regions throughout the Y-chromosome were analyzed. RESULTS: Initial cytogenetic karyotyping assessing 10-50 metaphases revealed 3 patients with Y-chromosome positivity. RT-PCR revealed further 6 patients with Y-chromosome, who were initially considered as Y-negatives by standard kayotyping. The consecutive cytogenetic analysis of a large number (about 100) of metaphases (in 5 patients) and/or FISH (in 6 patients) however, also confirmed the presence of the Y-chromosome in these patients. Prophylactic gonadectomy was carried out in all 9 patients and 1 of them was diagnosed as having bilateral gonadoblastoma without clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a routine molecular screening for hidden Y-chromosome sequences in Turner patients, who are negative for Y-chromosome by conventional cytogenetic analysis, in order to calculate the future risk of developing gonadoblastoma.