Literature DB >> 19625664

Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.

Kent Hecker1, Tyrone Donnon, Carmen Fuentealba, David Hall, Oscar Illanes, Doug W Morck, Christoph Muelling.   

Abstract

This study describes the development, implementation, and psychometric assessment of the multiple mini-interview (MMI) for the inaugural class of veterinary medicine applicants at the University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (UCVM). The MMI is a series of approximately five to 12 10-minute interviews that consist of situational events. Applicants are given a scenario and asked to work through an issue or behavioral-type questions that are meant to assess one attribute (e.g., empathy) at a time. This structure allows for multiple assessments of the applicants by trained interviewers on the same questions. MMI scenario development was based on a review of the noncognitive attributes currently assessed by the 31 veterinary schools across Canada and the United States and the goals and objectives of UCVM. The noncognitive attributes of applicants (N=110) were assessed at five stations, by two interviewers within each station, on three items using a standardized rating form on an anchored 1-5 scale. The method was determined to be reliable (G-coefficient=0.88) and demonstrated evidence of validity. The MMI score did not correlate with grade-point average (r=0.12, p=0.22). While neither the applicants nor interviewers had participated in an MMI format before, both groups reported the process to be acceptable in a post-interview questionnaire. This analysis provides preliminary evidence of the reliability, validity, and acceptability of the MMI in assessing the noncognitive attributes of applicants for veterinary medical school admissions.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625664     DOI: 10.3138/jvme.36.2.166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Educ        ISSN: 0748-321X            Impact factor:   1.027


  7 in total

1.  Perceptions and Cost-Analysis of a Multiple Mini-Interview in a Pharmacy School Admissions Process.

Authors:  Robin L Corelli; Michael A Muchnik; Ryan J Beechinor; Gary Fong; Eleanor M Vogt; Jennifer M Cocohoba; Candy Tsourounis; Karen Suchanek Hudmon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Academic entitlement in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Frank Romanelli; Kelly M Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  The effect of personality traits on undergraduate dental students' performance in multiple mini interviews.

Authors:  Lana Ahmed Shinawi; Sumer Madani Alaki; Ibrahim Yamany; Mona Hassan Ahmed Hassan
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-05-25

Review 4.  Multiple Mini-Interviews: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations.

Authors:  Sobia Ali; Muhammad Suleman Sadiq Hashmi; Mehnaz Umair; Mirza Aroosa Beg; Nighat Huda
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2019-12-12

5.  What should we be selecting for? A systematic approach for determining which personal characteristics to assess for during admissions.

Authors:  Peter Conlon; Kent Hecker; Susan Sabatini
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Multiple mini interviews: revealing similarities across institutions.

Authors:  Barbara Griffin; Jaime Auton; Robbert Duvivier; Boaz Shulruf; Wendy Hu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Is a veterinary student's performance on multiple-mini interviews affected by personality preferences?

Authors:  Munashe Chigerwe; Karen A Boudreaux; Jan E Ilkiw
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2019-01-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.