Literature DB >> 19624864

Accuracy of frequency-related parameters of the electrohysterogram for predicting preterm delivery: a review of the literature.

Maartje P G C Vinken1, Chiara Rabotti, Massimo Mischi, S Guid Oei.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The diagnosis of labor and effective prevention of preterm delivery are still among the most significant problems faced by obstetricians. Currently, there is no technique or method for objectively monitoring the uterus and assessing whether the organ has entered a state of increased activity that may indicate labor. Several studies have investigated a new, noninvasive technique to monitor uterine contractions: the electrohysterogram (EHG). Analysis of frequency-related parameters of the EHG may allow physiological uterine activity to be distinguished from uterine contractions that will lead to preterm delivery. However, although a variety of parameters and methodologies have been employed, they have not been objectively compared. The objective of this review, which was based on a systematic literature search using the Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases up to February 2008, was to determine whether frequency-related parameters of the EHG signal can reliably differentiate preterm contractions that will lead to preterm delivery from those that will not (in patients who will ultimately deliver at term) and to identify the most accurate parameter. Of all the different EHG parameters, both human and animal studies indicate that the power spectral density peak frequency may be the most predictive of true labor. The best parameter for predicting delivery is, therefore, related to the EHG spectral content shift, as calculated by Fourier transform, time-frequency, or Wavelet analysis. The incidence and extent to which shifts in uterine electrical spectral components occur, as the measurement-to-delivery interval decreases, imply that these changes might be used to predict preterm delivery. There is also promising data suggesting that a combination of the measured parameters, used as inputs to artificial neural network algorithms, may be more useful than individual ones for critically assessing uterine activity. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians. LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to recall the physiology of uterine contractions leading to labor, summarize the limitations of tocodynamometry, and outline four different electrohysterogram parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19624864     DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181a8c6b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  21 in total

1.  Windowed multivariate autoregressive model improving classification of labor vs. pregnancy contractions.

Authors:  Brynjar Karlsson; Mahmoud Hassan; Catherine Marque
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

2.  Non-invasive Foetal ECG - a Comparable Alternative to the Doppler CTG?

Authors:  J Reinhard; F Louwen
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Prenatal Foetal Non-invasive ECG instead of Doppler CTG - A Better Alternative?

Authors:  N Sänger; B R Hayes-Gill; S Schiermeier; W Hatzmann; J Yuan; E Herrmann; F Louwen; J Reinhard
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery.

Authors:  Miha Lucovnik; William L Maner; Linda R Chambliss; Richard Blumrick; James Balducci; Ziva Novak-Antolic; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour.

Authors:  Christine Urquhart; Rosemary Currell; Francoise Harlow; Liz Callow
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15

6.  Nifedipine-induced changes in the electrohysterogram of preterm contractions: feasibility in clinical practice.

Authors:  Maartje P G C Vinken; C Rabotti; M Mischi; J O E H van Laar; S G Oei
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-16

7.  Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods.

Authors:  Tammy Y Euliano; Minh Tam Nguyen; Shalom Darmanjian; Susan P McGorray; Neil Euliano; Allison Onkala; Anthony R Gregg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The Icelandic 16-electrode electrohysterogram database.

Authors:  Asgeir Alexandersson; Thora Steingrimsdottir; Jeremy Terrien; Catherine Marque; Brynjar Karlsson
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  Automated conduction velocity analysis in the electrohysterogram for prediction of imminent delivery: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hinke de Lau; Chiara Rabotti; Rianne Bijloo; Michael Johannes Rooijakkers; Massimo Mischi; S Guid Oei
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Automatic identification of motion artifacts in EHG recording for robust analysis of uterine contractions.

Authors:  Yiyao Ye-Lin; Javier Garcia-Casado; Gema Prats-Boluda; José Alberola-Rubio; Alfredo Perales
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.