Literature DB >> 19620676

Effects of dilution rate and retention time of concentrate on efficiency of microbial growth, methane production, and ruminal fermentation in Rusitec fermenters.

M E Martínez1, M J Ranilla, S Ramos, M L Tejido, M D Carro.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of 2 dilution rates (DL) and 2 concentrate retention times (RT) on microbial growth, methane production, and fermentation of a 30:70 alfalfa hay:concentrate diet in Rusitec fermenters maintained at similar pH. The DL were 3.78 (low DL, LDL) and 5.42%/h (high DL, HDL), and concentrate RT was either 24 h (T24) or 48 h (T48). Forage RT was 48 h in all fermenters. Apparent disappearance of diet DM and NDF was greater in HDL fermenters compared with LDL fermenters, but there was a significant DL x concentrate RT interaction, showing that the effect of DL was more pronounced in T48 compared with T24 fermenters. Methane production was not affected by DL, but was greater in T48 compared with T24 fermenters, which was consistent with the increased fiber degradation in T48 fermenters. Increasing DL augmented volatile fatty acid production and molar proportions of propionate, isovalerate, and valerate, and reduced those of caproate, but no effects were observed on acetate, butyrate, and isobutyrate proportions. Increasing concentrate RT resulted in greater volatile fatty acid production and proportions of acetate, butyrate, and caproate, but reduced those of propionate, valerate, and isovalerate. Ammonia-N production was not affected by concentrate RT, but was greater at HDL compared with LDL. Microbial growth was not affected by DL, but microbial growth efficiency was lower in HDL compared with LDL fermenters. Concentrate RT affected microbial growth and its efficiency, with both being greater in T48 compared with T24 fermenters. Carboxymetylcellulase and xylanase activities in ruminal fluid were greater in HDL compared with LDL fermenters, but were not affected by concentrate RT. There were DL x concentrate RT interactions for diet apparent disappearance, molar proportions of propionate, butyrate, isovalerate, and caproate, and acetate:propionate ratio, indicating that effects of DL on these variables were influenced by concentrate RT. The results would indicate that using higher DL and shorter concentrate RT than those typically used in Rusitec fermenters would contribute to improving the simulation of in vivo fermentation of high-concentrate diets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19620676     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Fuyong Li; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Lower Methane Emissions from Yak Compared with Cattle in Rusitec Fermenters.

Authors:  Jiandui Mi; Jianwei Zhou; Xiaodan Huang; Ruijun Long
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ruminal resistome of dairy cattle is individualized and the resistotypes are associated with milking traits.

Authors:  Ming-Yuan Xue; Yun-Yi Xie; Yi-Fan Zhong; Jian-Xin Liu; Le Luo Guan; Hui-Zeng Sun
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2021-02-10

4.  Effect of dietary peNDF levels on digestibility and rumen fermentation, and microbial community in growing goats.

Authors:  Jia Zhou; Benchu Xue; Anhai Hu; Shuangming Yue; Mei Wu; Qionghua Hong; Yuhan Wu; Zhisheng Wang; Lizhi Wang; Quanhui Peng; Bai Xue
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 5.  Unraveling the pros and cons of various in vitro methodologies for ruminant nutrition: a review.

Authors:  James R Vinyard; Antonio P Faciola
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-15

6.  Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the breed effect on the rumen microbiome and its associations with feed efficiency in beef cattle.

Authors:  Fuyong Li; Thomas C A Hitch; Yanhong Chen; Christopher J Creevey; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 14.650

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.