Literature DB >> 19620446

Autoimmune pancreatitis: differentiation from pancreatic carcinoma and normal pancreas on the basis of enhancement characteristics at dual-phase CT.

Naoki Takahashi1, Joel G Fletcher, David M Hough, Jeff L Fidler, Akira Kawashima, Jayawant N Mandrekar, Suresh T Chari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to define the pancreatic enhancement of autoimmune pancreatitis at dual-phase CT and to compare it with that of pancreatic carcinoma and a normal pancreas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dual-phase CT scans of 101 patients (43 with autoimmune pancreatitis, 13 cases of which were focal; 33 with pancreatic carcinoma, and 25 with a normal pancreas) were evaluated. One radiologist measured the CT attenuation of the pancreatic parenchyma and pancreatic masses in both the pancreatic and hepatic phases of imaging. The mean CT attenuation value of the pancreatic parenchyma in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis was compared with that in patients with a normal pancreas. The mean CT attenuation value of the focal masses in the focal form of autoimmune pancreatitis was compared with that of carcinomas.
RESULTS: In the pancreatic phase, the mean CT attenuation value of the pancreatic parenchyma in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis was significantly lower than that in patients with a normal pancreas (autoimmune pancreatitis, 85 HU; normal pancreas, 104 HU; p < 0.05). In the hepatic phase, however, the mean CT attenuation values were not significantly different (autoimmune pancreatitis, 96 HU; normal pancreas, 89 HU; p = 0.6). In the pancreatic phase, the mean CT attenuation value of the mass in autoimmune pancreatitis was not significantly different from that of carcinoma (autoimmune pancreatitis, 71 HU; carcinoma, 59 HU; p = 0.06), but in the hepatic phase, the value was significantly higher than that of carcinoma (autoimmune pancreatitis, 90 HU; carcinoma, 64 HU; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: At dual-phase CT, the enhancement patterns of the pancreas and pancreatic masses in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis are different from those of pancreatic carcinoma and normal pancreas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19620446     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  23 in total

1.  Pancreatic cancer in an 18-year-old boy.

Authors:  D L Kitara; H R Wabinga
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Differentiation of focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma: assessment by multiphase contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Naohiro Furuhashi; Kojiro Suzuki; Yusuke Sakurai; Mitsuru Ikeda; Yuichi Kawai; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Focal autoimmune pancreatitis: radiological characteristics help to distinguish from pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Gao-Feng Sun; Chang-Jing Zuo; Cheng-Wei Shao; Jian-Hua Wang; Jian Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Autoimmune pancreatitis: multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance (MR) findings in the Italian experience.

Authors:  Rossella Graziani; Simona Mautone; Maria Chiara Ambrosetti; Riccardo Manfredi; Thomas J Re; Lucia Calculli; Luca Frulloni; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Dual-phase computed tomography for assessment of pancreatic fibrosis and anastomotic failure risk following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yasushi Hashimoto; Guido M Sclabas; Naoki Takahashi; Yujiro Kirihara; Thomas C Smyrk; Marianne Huebner; Michael B Farnell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Incidence of benign disease in patients that underwent resection for presumed pancreatic cancer diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Eugene P Ceppa; Srinevas K Reddy; Bryan M Clary; Douglas S Tyler; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Autoimmune pancreatitis in the context of IgG4-related disease: review of imaging findings.

Authors:  Leslie K Lee; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A Simple Method to Evaluate Whether Pancreas Texture Can Be Used to Predict Pancreatic Fistula Risk After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Samet Yardimci; Yalçın Burak Kara; Davut Tuney; Wafi Attaallah; Mustafa Umit Ugurlu; Ender Dulundu; Şevket Cumhur Yegen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Differentiating autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic adenocarcinoma using dual-phase computed tomography.

Authors:  Atif Zaheer; Vikesh K Singh; Venkata S Akshintala; Satomi Kawamoto; Salina D Tsai; Kenneth L Gage; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Autoimmune pancreatitis.

Authors:  Bo-Guang Fan; Ake Andrén-Sandberg
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.