Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Registering systematic reviews.

Literature DB >> 19620270

Registering systematic reviews.

Sharon Straus¹, David Moher.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2009 PMID： 19620270 PMCID： PMC2802597 DOI： 10.1503/cmaj.081849

Source DB: PubMed Journal: CMAJ ISSN： 0820-3946 Impact factor: 8.262

× No keyword cloud information.

6 in total

1. Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned.

Authors: Chris A Silagy; Philippa Middleton; Sally Hopewell
Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-06-05 Impact factor: 56.272

2. Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.

Authors: An-Wen Chan; Douglas G Altman
Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Mar 26-Apr 1 Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3. Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study.

Authors: Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai; Marzia Lotrionte; Antonio Abbate; Luca Testa; Enrico Remigi; Francesco Burzotta; Marco Valgimigli; Enrico Romagnoli; Filippo Crea; Pierfrancesco Agostoni
Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-01-16

4. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.

Authors: Andrea C Tricco; Ba' Pham; Jamie Brehaut; Jacqueline Tetroe; Mario Cappelli; Sally Hopewell; John N Lavis; Jesse A Berlin; David Moher
Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5. Does this patient have bacterial peritonitis or portal hypertension? How do I perform a paracentesis and analyze the results?

Authors: Camilla L Wong; Jayna Holroyd-Leduc; Kevin E Thorpe; Sharon E Straus
Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272

6. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

Authors: David Moher; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Andrea C Tricco; Margaret Sampson; Douglas G Altman
Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-03-27 Impact factor: 11.069

6 in total

27 in total

1. What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.

Authors: Tianjing Li; S Swaroop Vedula; Roberta Scherer; Kay Dickersin
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 25.391

2. Register systematic reviews.

Authors: Tianjing Li
Journal: CMAJ Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 8.262

3. Letter to editor about "Surgical therapy vs conservative therapy for patients with acute injury of lateral ankle ligament: A meta-analysis and systematic review".

Authors: Mohammad E Heidari; Tina Arabzadeh
Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 3.315

4. Identification and Description of Reliable Evidence for 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines for Cataract in the Adult Eye.

Authors: Asieh Golozar; Yujiang Chen; Kristina Lindsley; Benjamin Rouse; David C Musch; Flora Lum; Barbara S Hawkins; Tianjing Li
Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 7.389

Registering systematic reviews.

1. Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned.

2. Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.

Review 3. Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study.

4. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.

Review 5. Does this patient have bacterial peritonitis or portal hypertension? How do I perform a paracentesis and analyze the results?

6. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

1. What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.

2. Register systematic reviews.

3. Letter to editor about "Surgical therapy vs conservative therapy for patients with acute injury of lateral ankle ligament: A meta-analysis and systematic review".

4. Identification and Description of Reliable Evidence for 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines for Cataract in the Adult Eye.

5. Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process.

6. Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Practice Guidelines Based on Systematic Reviews?

7. Accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: an overview of systematic reviews.

Review 8. The rationale behind systematic reviews in clinical medicine: a conceptual framework.

9. Best practice in systematic reviews: the importance of protocols and registration.

Review 10. Analysis of quality of clinical practice guidelines for otorhinolaryngology in China.