BACKGROUND: The optimal threshold for initiating HIV treatment is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare different thresholds for initiating HIV treatment. DESIGN: A validated computer simulation was used to weigh important harms from earlier initiation of antiretroviral therapy (toxicity, side effects, and resistance accumulation) against important benefits (decreased HIV-related mortality). DATA SOURCES: Veterans Aging Cohort Study (5742 HIV-infected patients and 11 484 matched uninfected controls) and published reports. TARGET POPULATION: Individuals with newly diagnosed chronic HIV infection and varying viral loads (10,000, 30,000, 100,000, and 300,000 copies/mL) and ages (30, 40, and 50 years). TIME HORIZON: Unlimited. PERSPECTIVE: Societal. INTERVENTION: Alternative thresholds for initiating antiretroviral therapy (CD4 counts of 200, 350, and 500 cells/mm3). OUTCOME MEASURES: Life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Although the simulation was biased against earlier treatment initiation because it used an upper-bound assumption for therapy-related toxicity, earlier treatment increased life expectancy and QALYs at age 30 years regardless of viral load (life expectancies with CD4 initiation thresholds of 500, 350, and 200 cells/mm3 were 18.2 years, 17.6 years, and 17.2 years, respectively, for a viral load of 10,000 copies/mL and 17.3 years, 15.9 years, and 14.5 years, respectively, for a viral load of 300,000 copies/mL), and increased life expectancies at age 40 years if viral loads were greater than 30 000 copies/mL (life expectancies were 12.5 years, 12.0 years, and 11.4 years, respectively, for a viral load of 300,000 copies/mL). RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Findings favoring early treatment were generally robust. LIMITATIONS: Results favoring later treatment may not be valid. The findings may not be generalizable to women. CONCLUSION: This simulation suggests that earlier initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy is often favored compared with current recommendations.
BACKGROUND: The optimal threshold for initiating HIV treatment is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare different thresholds for initiating HIV treatment. DESIGN: A validated computer simulation was used to weigh important harms from earlier initiation of antiretroviral therapy (toxicity, side effects, and resistance accumulation) against important benefits (decreased HIV-related mortality). DATA SOURCES: Veterans Aging Cohort Study (5742 HIV-infectedpatients and 11 484 matched uninfected controls) and published reports. TARGET POPULATION: Individuals with newly diagnosed chronic HIV infection and varying viral loads (10,000, 30,000, 100,000, and 300,000 copies/mL) and ages (30, 40, and 50 years). TIME HORIZON: Unlimited. PERSPECTIVE: Societal. INTERVENTION: Alternative thresholds for initiating antiretroviral therapy (CD4 counts of 200, 350, and 500 cells/mm3). OUTCOME MEASURES: Life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Although the simulation was biased against earlier treatment initiation because it used an upper-bound assumption for therapy-related toxicity, earlier treatment increased life expectancy and QALYs at age 30 years regardless of viral load (life expectancies with CD4 initiation thresholds of 500, 350, and 200 cells/mm3 were 18.2 years, 17.6 years, and 17.2 years, respectively, for a viral load of 10,000 copies/mL and 17.3 years, 15.9 years, and 14.5 years, respectively, for a viral load of 300,000 copies/mL), and increased life expectancies at age 40 years if viral loads were greater than 30 000 copies/mL (life expectancies were 12.5 years, 12.0 years, and 11.4 years, respectively, for a viral load of 300,000 copies/mL). RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Findings favoring early treatment were generally robust. LIMITATIONS: Results favoring later treatment may not be valid. The findings may not be generalizable to women. CONCLUSION: This simulation suggests that earlier initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy is often favored compared with current recommendations.
Authors: Andrew N Phillips; Alessandro Cozzi Lepri; Fiona Lampe; Margaret Johnson; Caroline A Sabin Journal: AIDS Date: 2003-09-05 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Scott D Holmberg; Anne C Moorman; John M Williamson; Tony C Tong; Douglas J Ward; Kathy C Wood; Alan E Greenberg; Robert S Janssen Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-11-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bruce R Schackman; Kenneth A Freedberg; Milton C Weinstein; Paul E Sax; Elena Losina; Hong Zhang; Sue J Goldie Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2002-11-25
Authors: Matthias Egger; Margaret May; Geneviève Chêne; Andrew N Phillips; Bruno Ledergerber; François Dabis; Dominique Costagliola; Antonella D'Arminio Monforte; Frank de Wolf; Peter Reiss; Jens D Lundgren; Amy C Justice; Schlomo Staszewski; Catherine Leport; Robert S Hogg; Caroline A Sabin; M John Gill; Bernd Salzberger; Jonathan A C Sterne Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-07-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Frank J Palella; Maria Deloria-Knoll; Joan S Chmiel; Anne C Moorman; Kathleen C Wood; Alan E Greenberg; Scott D Holmberg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Nina Friis-Møller; Caroline A Sabin; Rainer Weber; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Wafaa M El-Sadr; Peter Reiss; Rodolphe Thiébaut; Linda Morfeldt; Stephane De Wit; Christian Pradier; Gonzalo Calvo; Matthew G Law; Ole Kirk; Andrew N Phillips; Jens D Lundgren Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-11-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amin Khademi; Denis Saure; Andrew Schaefer; Kimberly Nucifora; R Scott Braithwaite; Mark S Roberts Journal: Value Health Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: R Scott Braithwaite; David A Fiellin; Kimberly Nucifora; Kendall Bryant; Mark Roberts; Nancy Kim; Amy C Justice Journal: Value Health Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Douglas A Jabs; Alka Ahuja; Mark L Van Natta; Alice T Lyon; Steven Yeh; Ronald Danis Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Kimberly B Ulett; James H Willig; Hui-Yi Lin; Justin S Routman; Sarah Abroms; Jeroan Allison; Ashlee Chatham; James L Raper; Michael S Saag; Michael J Mugavero Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: R Scott Braithwaite; Mark S Roberts; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Cynthia L Gibert; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Kimberly Nucifora; Amy C Justice Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Rochelle P Walensky; Lindsey L Wolf; Robin Wood; Mariam O Fofana; Kenneth A Freedberg; Neil A Martinson; A David Paltiel; Xavier Anglaret; Milton C Weinstein; Elena Losina Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 25.391