| Literature DB >> 19619274 |
Steven D Buckingham1, David B Sattelle.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The "thrashing assay", in which nematodes are placed in liquid and the frequency of lateral swimming ("thrashing") movements estimated, is a well-established method for measuring motility in the genetic model organism Caenorhabditis elegans as well as in parasitic nematodes. It is used as an index of the effects of drugs, chemicals or mutations on motility and has proved useful in identifying mutants affecting behaviour. However, the method is laborious, subject to experimenter error, and therefore does not permit high-throughput applications. Existing automation methods usually involve analysis of worm shape, but this is computationally demanding and error-prone. Here we present a novel, robust and rapid method of automatically counting the thrashing frequency of worms that avoids morphometry but nonetheless gives a direct measure of thrashing frequency. Our method uses principal components analysis to remove the background, followed by computation of a covariance matrix of the remaining image frames from which the interval between statistically-similar frames is estimated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19619274 PMCID: PMC2729753 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-84
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Figure 1Covariance analysis of worm swimming facilitates automated phenotyping. (A) A typical image from a movie of a worm thrashing in a well of a 96-well plate. (B) The same image, after removal of the first Principal Component to eliminate most of the image background. (C) A summary of the method used to measure worm swimming rates using covariance. After acquisition with a digital camera attached to a stereomicroscope, movies are stored for subsequent analysis. (D) After subtracting the background using Principal Components Analysis, a covariance matrix is computed. (E) The number of frames separating two peaks in covariance is equal to the interval over which the worm has undergone a complete cycle of conformations, and is therefore twice the interval between thrashes. (F) A sequence of background-subtracted images corresponding to the points in (D) and (E) covering a single thrash cycle.
Figure 2Comparison of automated thrashing assay with manual measurements. (A) The performance of the machine method on C. elegans is compared with that of two human observers. The variance in the automated system's performance can therefore be compared with the difference in performance between two trained observers. Each point represents the mean of counts for 8 worms, in accordance with the customary thrashing assay. (B) Comparison of results for individual C. elegans with mutations in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with ranges of motilities. (C) Although the machine frequently underestimates the counts because of outliers, the effect of these outliers in each batch of 8 worms is reduced when the medians for each method are plotted. (D) A comparison of automated and manual thrashing assays on C. elegans or the parasitic nematode, Haemonchus contortus, in the presence of two concentrations of levamisole. Despite the challenges presented by H. contortus, the automated assay produces similar results to manual measurements.