Literature DB >> 19617391

Alteration of the ileal microbiota of weanling piglets by the growth-promoting antibiotic chlortetracycline.

Elizabeth Rettedal1, Sébastien Vilain, Stacy Lindblom, Kelly Lehnert, Clay Scofield, Sajan George, Sharon Clay, Radhey S Kaushik, Artur J M Rosa, David Francis, Volker S Brözel.   

Abstract

Antibiotics such as chlortetracycline (CTC) have been used to promote growth of pigs for decades, but concerns over increased antibiotic-resistant infections in humans have prompted the development of alternative strategies. Developing alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) could be informed by information on the mechanisms of growth promotion, notably, how AGPs affect the microbial populations of the gastrointestinal tract. Pigs from three sows were aseptically delivered by cesarean section. Six piglets were distributed to each of two foster mothers until weaning, when piglets were fed a diet with or without 50 mg/kg CTC for 2 weeks. The ileal bacterial microbiota was characterized by using a cultivation-independent approach based on DNA extraction, PCR amplification, cloning, and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene pool. The ileal and mucosal communities of these growing pigs were dominated by Lactobacillus bacteria, various members of the family Clostridiaceae, and members of the poorly known genus Turicibacter. Overall, CTC treatment resulted in three shifts: a decrease in Lactobacillus johnsonii, an increase in L. amylovorus, and a decrease in Turicibacter phylotypes. The composition of the microbiota varied considerably between individual pigs, as revealed by shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and similarity (SONS) analysis (theta(YC) values). While the observed variation between untreated pigs obscured the possible effect of CTC, integral-LIBSHUFF and SONS analyses of pooled libraries indicated a significant shift due to CTC in both the lumen and the mucosa, with some OTUs unique to either treated or control ileum. DOTUR analysis revealed little overlap between control and treated communities at the 3% difference level, indicating unique ileal communities in the presence of CTC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19617391      PMCID: PMC2737922          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02220-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  42 in total

1.  Observations on growth responses to antibiotics and arsonic acids in poultry feeds.

Authors:  D A LIBBY; P J SCHAIBLE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Integration of microbial ecology and statistics: a test to compare gene libraries.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Bret R Larget; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Identification of intestinal bacteria responsible for fermentation of gum arabic in pig model.

Authors:  Akio Kishimoto; Kazunari Ushida; Glyn O Phillips; Takashi Ogasawara; Yasushi Sasaki
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Comparison of cellular fatty acid profiles of the microbiota in different gut regions of BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Vaahtovuo Jussi; Eerola Erkki; Toivanen Paavo
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Genes encoding bile salt hydrolases and conjugated bile salt transporters in Lactobacillus johnsonii 100-100 and other Lactobacillus species.

Authors:  C A Elkins; S A Moser; D C Savage
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains isolated from porcine gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Pyoung Il Kim; Min Young Jung; Young-Hyo Chang; Saehun Kim; Seong-Jae Kim; Yong-Ha Park
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Comparison of ileum microflora of pigs fed corn-, wheat-, or barley-based diets by chaperonin-60 sequencing and quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Janet E Hill; Sean M Hemmingsen; Blair G Goldade; Tim J Dumonceaux; Jonathan Klassen; Ruurd T Zijlstra; Swee Han Goh; Andrew G Van Kessel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Molecular ecological analysis of porcine ileal microbiota responses to antimicrobial growth promoters.

Authors:  C T Collier; M R Smiricky-Tjardes; D M Albin; J E Wubben; V M Gabert; B Deplancke; D Bane; D B Anderson; H R Gaskins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Selection of bacteria originating from a human intestinal microbiota in the gut of previously germ-free rats.

Authors:  Tine Rask Licht; Bodil Madsen; Andrea Wilcks
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.742

10.  At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies.

Authors:  Kevin E Ashelford; Nadia A Chuzhanova; John C Fry; Antonia J Jones; Andrew J Weightman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  From structure to function: the ecology of host-associated microbial communities.

Authors:  Courtney J Robinson; Brendan J M Bohannan; Vincent B Young
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Draft genome sequence of Turicibacter sanguinis PC909, isolated from human feces.

Authors:  Páraic Ó Cuív; Eline S Klaassens; A Scott Durkin; Derek M Harkins; Les Foster; Jamison McCorrison; Manolito Torralba; Karen E Nelson; Mark Morrison
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  In situ prebiotics for weaning piglets: in vitro production and fermentation of potato galacto-rhamnogalacturonan.

Authors:  Mikael Lenz Strube; Helle Christine Ravn; Hans-Christian Ingerslev; Anne Strunge Meyer; Mette Boye
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The impact of orally administered phages on host immune response and surrounding microbial communities.

Authors:  Yingying Hong; Jyothi Thimmapuram; Jiayi Zhang; Clayton K Collings; Ketaki Bhide; Kyle Schmidt; Paul D Ebner
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2016-07-13

5.  Oral Administration of a Select Mixture of Bacillus Probiotics Affects the Gut Microbiota and Goblet Cell Function following Escherichia coli Challenge in Newly Weaned Pigs of Genotype MUC4 That Are Supposed To Be Enterotoxigenic E. coli F4ab/ac Receptor Negative.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Yao-Hong Zhu; Dong Zhou; Qiong Wu; Dan Song; Johan Dicksved; Jiu-Feng Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Assessment of bacterial and archaeal community structure in Swine wastewater treatment processes.

Authors:  Marcio Luis Busi Da Silva; Mauricio Egídio Cantão; Melissa Paola Mezzari; Jie Ma; Carlos Wolfgang Nossa
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 7.  Direct sequencing of the human microbiome readily reveals community differences.

Authors:  Justin Kuczynski; Elizabeth K Costello; Diana R Nemergut; Jesse Zaneveld; Christian L Lauber; Dan Knights; Omry Koren; Noah Fierer; Scott T Kelley; Ruth E Ley; Jeffrey I Gordon; Rob Knight
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Microbial shifts in the swine distal gut in response to the treatment with antimicrobial growth promoter, tylosin.

Authors:  Hyeun Bum Kim; Klaudyna Borewicz; Bryan A White; Randall S Singer; Srinand Sreevatsan; Zheng Jin Tu; Richard E Isaacson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Replacing dietary antibiotics with 0.20% l-glutamine in swine nursery diets: impact on intestinal physiology and the microbiome following weaning and transport.

Authors:  Alan W Duttlinger; Ruth E Centeno Martinez; Betty R McConn; Kouassi R Kpodo; Donald C Lay; Brian T Richert; Timothy A Johnson; Jay S Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Use of Lactobacillus plantarum (strains 22F and 25F) and Pediococcus acidilactici (strain 72N) as replacements for antibiotic-growth promotants in pigs.

Authors:  Pawiya Pupa; Prasert Apiwatsiri; Wandee Sirichokchatchawan; Nopadon Pirarat; Tanawong Maison; Anantawat Koontanatechanon; Nuvee Prapasarakul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.