Literature DB >> 25432577

Assessment of bacterial and archaeal community structure in Swine wastewater treatment processes.

Marcio Luis Busi Da Silva1, Mauricio Egídio Cantão, Melissa Paola Mezzari, Jie Ma, Carlos Wolfgang Nossa.   

Abstract

Microbial communities from two field-scale swine wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were assessed by pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) fragments. Effluent samples from secondary (anaerobic covered lagoons and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket [UASB]) and tertiary treatment systems (open-pond natural attenuation lagoon and air-sparged nitrification-denitrification tank followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation process) were analyzed. A total of 56,807 and 48,859 high-quality reads were obtained from bacterial and archaeal libraries, respectively. Dominant bacterial communities were associated with the phylum Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, or Actinobacteria. Bacteria and archaea diversity were highest in UASB effluent sample. Escherichia, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and/or Prevotella were used as indicators of putative pathogen reduction throughout the WWTPs. Satisfactory pathogen reduction was observed after the open-pond natural attenuation lagoon but not after the air-sparged nitrification/denitrification followed by alkaline phosphorus precipitation treatment processes. Among the archaeal communities, 80% of the reads was related to hydrogeno-trophic methanogens Methanospirillum. Enrichment of hydrogenotrophic methanogens detected in effluent samples from the anaerobic covered lagoons and UASB suggested that CO2 reduction with H2 was the dominant methanogenic pathway in these systems. Overall, the results served to improve our current understanding of major microbial communities' changes downgradient from the pen and throughout swine WWTP as a result of different treatment processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432577     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-014-0537-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  61 in total

1.  Characterisation of the microbial diversity in a pig manure storage pit using small subunit rDNA sequence analysis.

Authors:  Raúl Snell-Castro; Jean-Jacques Godon; Jean-Philippe Delgenès; Patrick Dabert
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 2.  Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research.

Authors:  Jens Walter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Anders Lanzén; Thomas P Curtis; Russell J Davenport; Neil Hall; Ian M Head; L Fiona Read; William T Sloan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Molecular microbial diversity of an anaerobic digestor as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis.

Authors:  J J Godon; E Zumstein; P Dabert; F Habouzit; R Moletta
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Novel primers for 16S rRNA-based archaeal community analyses in environmental samples.

Authors:  Stephan Gantner; Anders F Andersson; Laura Alonso-Sáez; Stefan Bertilsson
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Genome sequence of Lactobacillus amylovorus GRL1118, isolated from pig ileum.

Authors:  Ravi Kant; Lars Paulin; Edward Alatalo; Willem M de Vos; Airi Palva
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Livestock waste treatment systems for reducing environmental exposure to hazardous enteric pathogens: some considerations.

Authors:  E Topp; A Scott; D R Lapen; E Lyautey; P Duriez
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 9.642

8.  Broad diversity and newly cultured bacterial isolates from enrichment of pig feces on complex polysaccharides.

Authors:  Cherie J Ziemer
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Occurrence and reactivation of viable but non-culturable E. coli in sewage sludge after mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  Bo Fu; Qian Jiang; Hongbo Liu; He Liu
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.461

10.  Microbial ecology, bacterial pathogens, and antibiotic resistant genes in swine manure wastewater as influenced by three swine management systems.

Authors:  John P Brooks; Ardeshir Adeli; Michael R McLaughlin
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 11.236

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Swine manure valorization in fabrication of nutrition and energy.

Authors:  Abdulmoseen Segun Giwa; Nasir Ali; Muhammad Asif
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Feasibility of anaerobic digestion on the release of biogas and heavy metals from rice straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide.

Authors:  Liqing Xin; Zhaohui Guo; Xiyuan Xiao; Chi Peng; Peng Zeng; Wenli Feng; Wenxuan Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Assessment of Bacterial Community Assembly Patterns and Processes in Pig Manure Slurry.

Authors:  Priyanka Kumari; Hong L Choi; Sartika I A Sudiarto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pollution Gradients Altered the Bacterial Community Composition and Stochastic Process of Rural Polluted Ponds.

Authors:  Xin Tai; Rui Li; Bao Zhang; Hao Yu; Xiao Kong; Zhihui Bai; Ye Deng; Lan Jia; Decai Jin
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-02-24

5.  The diversity of hydrogen-producing bacteria and methanogens within an in situ coal seam.

Authors:  Xianbo Su; Weizhong Zhao; Daping Xia
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 6.  Nutritional, Energy and Sanitary Aspects of Swine Manure and Carcass Co-digestion.

Authors:  Deisi Cristina Tápparo; Paula Rogovski; Rafael Dorighello Cadamuro; Doris Sobral Marques Souza; Charline Bonatto; Aline Frumi Camargo; Thamarys Scapini; Fábio Stefanski; André Amaral; Airton Kunz; Marta Hernández; Helen Treichel; David Rodríguez-Lázaro; Gislaine Fongaro
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.