Literature DB >> 1961639

Fluctuation of the differential light threshold at the border of absolute scotomas. Comparison between glaucomatous visual field defects and blind spots.

I O Haefliger1, J Flammer.   

Abstract

The outcome of repeated measurements of the differential light sensitivity fluctuates slightly. This fluctuation can be markedly increased in glaucoma patients but has also been described at the border of the blind spot of healthy subjects. The question arises, therefore, whether in glaucoma this increase may be due to the fact that many test locations may touch the border of (detected or undetected) scotomas. This study compares the behavior of the threshold at the border of glaucomatous defects and blind spots. The threshold was measured with program F8 of the Octopus 201 (Interzeag, Inc, Schlieren, Switzerland) automated static perimeter. The results revealed that the borders of glaucomatous defects are less steep than those of blind spots, the fluctuation is largest just at the border of the scotomas in both groups, and that the fluctuation is significantly larger at the edge of glaucomatous defects than at the edge of blind spots of normal subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1961639     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32093-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Harry J Wyatt; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Macular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trials.

Authors:  Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Willam J Feuer; Sharon B Schwartz; Robert C Russell; Janet D Steinberg; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Automated perimetry: using gaze-direction data to improve the estimate of scotoma edges.

Authors:  Harry J Wyatt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Differences in the Relation Between Perimetric Sensitivity and Variability Between Locations Across the Visual Field.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Visual field test simulation and error in threshold estimation.

Authors:  S E Spenceley; D B Henson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Modeling the relative influence of fixation and sampling errors on retest variability in perimetry.

Authors:  T Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Quantification of Visual Field Variability in Glaucoma: Implications for Visual Field Prediction and Modeling.

Authors:  Alessandro Rabiolo; Esteban Morales; Abdelmonem A Afifi; Fei Yu; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 8.  The discovery of the Flammer syndrome: a historical and personal perspective.

Authors:  Josef Flammer; Katarzyna Konieczka
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  Reducing Spatial Uncertainty Through Attentional Cueing Improves Contrast Sensitivity in Regions of the Visual Field With Glaucomatous Defects.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.