Literature DB >> 1961148

The design of megavoltage projection imaging systems: some theoretical aspects.

W Swindell1, E J Morton, P M Evans, D G Lewis.   

Abstract

This study investigates factors associated with the imaging of a patient using a high-energy radiotherapy treatment beam. Both single-stage (e.g., solid-state detector) and two-stage (e.g., scintillation screen plus TV) systems are considered. First an expression is derived that relates dose at the buildup depth in the object to the structure of the object, the scatter-to-primary signal-variance ratio and the differential-signal-to-noise ratio in the image. Second the number of bits required to digitize the image is derived. Third the effect of scattered radiation is investigated for photon counting, photopeak, and Compton detector types. Fourth the effect of noise in the detection process is considered. Finally, the relationship between x-ray source size, detector aperture, and image magnification is derived. The optimum magnification for given source size and detector aperture is discussed in terms of the system transfer function. The study indicates that at a primary beam energy of 2 MeV, a dose of 10(-3) cGy is required to detect reliably the presence of a bone section of area 10 x 10 mm and thickness 4 mm in 250 mm of soft tissue. For this example, it is also estimated that a digitization accuracy of 10 bits is required. The calculations indicate that for a Compton detector, the scatter-to-primary signal-variance ratio drops from a value of around 30% at the exit surface of the object to 5% at a distance of 80 cm from the object with a consequent small reduction in the dose required to form the image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1961148     DOI: 10.1118/1.596735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

Review 1.  Anniversary paper. Development of x-ray computed tomography: the role of medical physics and AAPM from the 1970s to present.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Pan; Jeffrey Siewerdsen; Patrick J La Riviere; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  [Monitor assessment of digitalized and post-processed portal films compared to conventional films presented on a light box].

Authors:  S Wachter; N Gerstner; A Colotto; A Battmann; A Gahleitner; U Haverkamp; R Pötter
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Modelling the transport of optical photons in scintillation detectors for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Feasibility of using two-dimensional array dosimeter for in vivo dose reconstruction via transit dosimetry.

Authors:  Heeteak Chung; Jonathan Li; Sanjiv Samant
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.