Literature DB >> 1961145

Turbulent flow effects on NMR imaging: measurement of turbulent intensity.

J H Gao1, J O Gore.   

Abstract

A general expression has been derived for the NMR signal from a fluid in steady but turbulent flow in a magnetic field gradient. The precise dependences of the spin echo amplitude on both flow and experimental parameters are described in terms of the temporal autocorrelation function for velocity fluctuations in the fluid. The correlation function width determines whether a diffusion model of turbulent eddies is valid, and for physiological flow in large vessels in NMR imaging a more appropriate measure is the turbulent intensity of velocity fluctuations. The theoretical predictions have been verified in experiments using gradient echo images of flowing water. The theory also predicts that even echo rephasing phenomena may still occur in MR imaging of turbulent flows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1961145     DOI: 10.1118/1.596645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Amirhossein Arzani; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Optimization of b-value sampling for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Hersh Chandarana; Pippa Storey; Qun Chen; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Fundamentals of turbulent flow spectrum imaging.

Authors:  Hannes Dillinger; Charles McGrath; Christian Guenthner; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Petter Dyverfeldt; Michael D Hope; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01

5.  Discrepancies between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and Doppler echocardiography in the measurement of transvalvular gradient in aortic stenosis: the effect of flow vorticity.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Romain Capoulade; Florent Le Ven; Emmanuel Gaillard; Lyes Kadem; Philippe Pibarot; Éric Larose
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time.

Authors:  Kieran R O'Brien; Ruvin S Gabriel; Andreas Greiser; Brett R Cowan; Alistair A Young; Andrew J Kerr
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Quantification of microcirculatory parameters by joint analysis of flow-compensated and non-flow-compensated intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) data.

Authors:  André Ahlgren; Linda Knutsson; Ronnie Wirestam; Markus Nilsson; Freddy Ståhlberg; Daniel Topgaard; Samo Lasič
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.044

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.