Literature DB >> 19610517

Mesh versus non-mesh repair of ventral abdominal hernias.

A M Malik1, A Jawaid, A H Talpur, A A Laghari, A Khan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the relative effectiveness of mesh and suture repair of ventral abdominal hernias in terms of clinical outcome, quality of life and rate of recurrence in both the techniques.
METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive analysis of 236 patients with mesh and non-mesh repair of primary ventral hernias performed between January 2000 to December 2004 at Surgery Department, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro. The record sheets of the patients were analyzed and data retrieved to compare the results of both techniques for short-term and long-term results. The data retrieved is statistically analyzed on SPSS version 11.
RESULTS: There were 43 (18.22%) males and 193 (81.77%) females with a mean age of 51.79 years and a range of 59 (81-22). Para-umbilical hernia was the commonest of ventral hernia and accounted for 49.8% (n=118) of the total study population followed by incisional hernia comprising 24% (n=57) of the total number. There was a significant difference in the recurrent rate at 3 years interval with 23/101 (22.77%) recurrences in suture-repaired subjects compared to 10/135 (7.40%) in mesh repair group. Chronic pain lasting up to 1-2 years was noted in 14 patients with suture repair. Wound infection is comparatively more common (8.14%) in mesh group. The other variables such as operative and postoperative complications, total hospital stay and quality of life is also discussed.
CONCLUSION: Mesh repair of ventral hernia is much superior to non-mesh suture repair in terms of recurrence and overall outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19610517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad        ISSN: 1025-9589


  7 in total

1.  Repair of small and medium size ventral hernias with a Proceed Ventral Patch: a single center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Peter Ambe; Angela Meyer; Lothar Köhler
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Complications of mesh devices for intraperitoneal umbilical hernia repair: a word of caution.

Authors:  F E Muysoms; J Bontinck; P Pletinckx
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Polyester composite versus PTFE in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Modesto J Colon; Dana A Telem; Edward Chin; Kaare Weber; Celia M Divino; Scott Q Nguyen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Mesh repair of paraumblical hernia, outcome of 58 cases.

Authors:  Deari Ahmed Ismaeil
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-13

5.  A systematic methodological review of non-randomised interventional studies of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and a standardised minimum dataset are needed.

Authors:  S G Parker; S Halligan; M Erotocritou; C P J Wood; R W Boulton; A A O Plumb; A C J Windsor; S Mallett
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Mesh Or Patch for Hernia on Epigastric and Umbilical Sites (MORPHEUS trial): study protocol for a multi-centre patient blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeroen E H Ponten; Bart J M Leenders; Jan A Charbon; Tanja Lettinga-van de Poll; Jeroen Heemskerk; Ingrid S Martijnse; Joop L M Konsten; Simon W Nienhuijs
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Outcomes following repair of incarcerated and strangulated ventral hernias with or without synthetic mesh.

Authors:  Sameh Hany Emile; Hesham Elgendy; Ahmad Sakr; Waleed Ahmed Gado; Ahmed Aly Abdelmawla; Mahmoud Abdelnaby; Alaa Magdy
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.