Literature DB >> 19610321

Full-field acoustomammography using an acousto-optic sensor.

J S Sandhu, R A Schmidt, P J La Rivière.   

Abstract

In this Letter the authors introduce a wide-field transmission ultrasound approach to breast imaging based on the use of a large area acousto-optic (AO) sensor. Accompanied by a suitable acoustic source, such a detector could be mounted on a traditional mammography system and provide a mammographylike ultrasound projection image of the compressed breast in registration with the x-ray mammogram. The authors call the approach acoustography. The hope is that this additional information could improve the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography. The AO sensor converts ultrasound directly into a visual image by virtue of the acousto-optic effect of the liquid crystal layer contained in the AO sensor. The image is captured with a digital video camera for processing, analysis, and storage. In this Letter, the authors perform a geometrical resolution analysis and also present images of a multimodality breast phantom imaged with both mammography and acoustography to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach. The geometric resolution analysis suggests that the technique could readily detect tumors of diameter of 3 mm using 8.5 MHz ultrasound, with smaller tumors detectable with higher frequency ultrasound, though depth penetration might then become a limiting factor. The preliminary phantom images show high contrast and compare favorably to digital mammograms of the same phantom. The authors have introduced and established, through phantom imaging, the feasibility of a full-field transmission ultrasound detector for breast imaging based on the use of a large area AO sensor. Of course variations in attenuation of connective, glandular, and fatty tissues will lead to images with more cluttered anatomical background than those of the phantom imaged here. Acoustic coupling to the mammographically compressed breast, particularly at the margins, will also have to be addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19610321      PMCID: PMC2832069          DOI: 10.1118/1.3132273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.

Authors:  Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Linn A Abraham; Edward A Sickles; Constance D Lehman; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Donald L Weaver; William E Barlow; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Detection of breast cancer with ultrasound tomography: first results with the Computed Ultrasound Risk Evaluation (CURE) prototype.

Authors:  Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lou Poulo; Alex Babkin; Roman Pevzner; Earle Holsapple; Olsi Rama; Carri Glide
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Automated ultrasound scanning on a dual-modality breast imaging system: coverage and motion issues and solutions.

Authors:  Sumedha P Sinha; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Christine R Lashbrook; Kai E Thomenius; Carl L Chalek; Paul L Carson
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.153

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Feasibility study of complex wavefield retrieval in off-axis acoustic holography employing an acousto-optic sensor.

Authors:  Guillermo López Rodríguez; Joshua Weber; Jaswinder Singh Sandhu; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  TRANSDUCER FIELD IMAGING USING ACOUSTOGRAPHY.

Authors:  Jaswinder S Sandhu; Robert W Schoonover; Joshua I Weber; J Tawiah; Vitaliy Kunin; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  Adv Acoust Vib       Date:  2012

Review 3.  Radiomics in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer and Nodules: Explorations, Application, and Limitations.

Authors:  Yuan Cao; Xiao Zhong; Wei Diao; Jingshi Mu; Yue Cheng; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.