Literature DB >> 19609737

Which women should be selected for vertebral fracture assessment? Comparing different methods of targeting VFA.

Edward T Middleton1, Eric D Gardiner, Susan A Steel.   

Abstract

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is a potential screening tool for vertebral fractures, but it is uncertain how to optimize the selection of women for VFA. We investigate the use of a probability score (VFscore) to select women for VFA screening and compare this to other means of targeting VFA. We identified 1,572 treatment-naive women over age 65 who had undergone routine VFA screening. Risk factors for fracture on VFA were identified using multivariate logistic regression, and a VFscore was created. Different thresholds of VFscore were examined and compared to using BMD as a means of targeting screening. After multivariate logistic regression, the risk factors significantly associated with the presence of a fracture on VFA were age, femoral neck BMD, prior clinical fracture, and height loss/kyphosis. The VFscore derived from these factors had a 65.5% sensitivity and a 65.5% specificity for determining vertebral fracture status. For equal resource requirements, the VFscore identified more women with fracture than using BMD category to target VFA. Compared to routinely screening all women, VFscore enabled a 30% reduction in the number of women undergoing VFA while still identifying >90% of women with a vertebral fracture. Overall, a large proportion of the population is required to undergo VFA in order to ensure that the majority of women with a vertebral fracture are selected for screening. The VFscore increased the efficiency of VFA screening to a modest degree compared to screening routinely or according to BMD category.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19609737     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-009-9268-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  10 in total

Review 1.  Spinal radiographs in those with back pain-when are they appropriate to diagnose vertebral fractures?

Authors:  E M Clark; S R Cummings; J T Schousboe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Lekamwasam; J D Adachi; D Agnusdei; J Bilezikian; S Boonen; F Borgström; C Cooper; A Diez Perez; R Eastell; L C Hofbauer; J A Kanis; B L Langdahl; O Lesnyak; R Lorenc; E McCloskey; O D Messina; N Napoli; B Obermayer-Pietsch; S H Ralston; P N Sambrook; S Silverman; M Sosa; J Stepan; G Suppan; D A Wahl; J E Compston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Using clinical risk factors and bone mineral density to determine who among patients undergoing bone densitometry should have vertebral fracture assessment.

Authors:  T J Vokes; D L Gillen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Prevalence of vertebral fractures in women and men in the population-based Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Svanhild Waterloo; Luai A Ahmed; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman; Bente Morseth; Nguyen D Nguyen; Tuan Nguyen; Anne J Sogaard; Nina Emaus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Vertebral fracture in postmenopausal Chinese women: a population-based study.

Authors:  L Cui; L Chen; W Xia; Y Jiang; L Cui; W Huang; W Wang; X Wang; Y Pei; X Zheng; Q Wang; Z Ning; M Li; O Wang; X Xing; Q Lin; W Yu; X Weng; L Xu; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Vertebral fracture assessment scans enhance targeting of investigations and treatment within a fracture risk assessment pathway.

Authors:  K-P Kuet; D Charlesworth; N F A Peel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Important risk factors and attributable risk of vertebral fractures in the population-based Tromsø study.

Authors:  Svanhild Waterloo; Tuan Nguyen; Luai A Ahmed; Jacqueline R Center; Bente Morseth; Nguyen D Nguyen; John A Eisman; Anne J Søgaard; Nina Emaus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Vertebral fractures and self-perceived health in elderly women and men in a population-based cross-sectional study: the Tromsø Study 2007-08.

Authors:  Svanhild Waterloo; Anne J Søgaard; Luai A Ahmed; Elin Damsgård; Bente Morseth; Nina Emaus
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Cross-sectional associations between prevalent vertebral fracture and pulmonary function in the sixth Tromsø study.

Authors:  Bente Morseth; Hasse Melbye; Svanhild Waterloo; Marte R Thomassen; Marijke J Risberg; Nina Emaus
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Determinants of trabecular bone score and prevalent vertebral fractures in women with fragility fractures: a cross-sectional sub-study of NoFRACT.

Authors:  T T Borgen; Å Bjørnerem; L B Solberg; C Andreasen; C Brunborg; M-B Stenbro; L M Hübschle; W Figved; E M Apalset; J-E Gjertsen; T Basso; I Lund; A K Hansen; J-M Stutzer; C Dahl; L Nordsletten; F Frihagen; E F Eriksen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.507

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.