Literature DB >> 19609568

Simulating inadequate dialysis and its correction using an individualized patient-derived nomogram.

Alison Joanne Lee1, Kevin Kho, Kee-Seng Chia, Tze-Liang Oi, Christopher Yap, Pei-Pei Foong, Yew-Weng Lau, Lee-Kean Lim, Eric Aragon, Chien-Wyei Liew, Hui-Kim Yap.   

Abstract

Computerized kinetic modeling is a valuable automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) prescription tool for optimizing dialysis adequacy. However, non-compliance results in failure to achieve adequacy targets. The aim of this study was to determine if a nomogram could estimate dialysis compensations for shortfalls in simulated non-compliant patients, such that total weekly urea clearance (Kt/V(urea)) targets are met. Individualized nomograms comprising a series of curves were derived from PD Adequest (ver. 2.0)-predicted Kt/V(urea) data (r (2 ) > 0.99) for different APD prescriptions. The nomogram was then used to estimate the (Nomogram-computed) average of the daily Kt/V(urea) in 14 patients. The study comprised three 1-month phases. Patients were compliant to dialysis in phase I, where Adequest-predicted Kt/V(urea) showed good agreement with both measured (r (I) = 0.72), and Nomogram-computed values (r (I) > 0.99) (p < 0.001). Conversely, in non-compliant phase II, Nomogram-computed values were lower than Adequest-predicted values (p < 0.002). In phase III, the nomogram estimated prescription adjustments required to compensate for shortfalls, such that there was significantly less difference between Nomogram-computed and Adequest-predicted Kt/V(urea) than in phase II (p = 0.005). Thus, despite non-compliance, predicted Kt/V(urea) targets were attained using the nomogram to adjust the daily APD prescriptions. This concept is potentially useful for patients desiring to compensate for inadvertent shortfalls, rather than for 'truly non-compliant' patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19609568     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-009-1241-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  26 in total

1.  Peritoneal transport properties and dialysis dose affect growth and nutritional status in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis. Mid-European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group.

Authors:  F Schaefer; G Klaus; O Mehls
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  K Ateş; G Nergizoğlu; K Keven; A Sen; S Kutlay; S Ertürk; N Duman; O Karatan; A E Ertuğ
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Clinical practice recommendations for peritoneal dialysis adequacy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Validation of PD Adequest 2.0 for pediatric dialysis patients.

Authors:  B A Warady; S L Watkins; B A Fivush; S P Andreoli; I Salusky; E C Kohaut; E F Vonesh
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Renal transplantation, chronic dialysis, and chronic renal insufficiency in children and adolescents. The 1995 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study.

Authors:  B A Warady; D Hébert; E K Sullivan; S R Alexander; A Tejani
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  A multinational clinical validation study of PD ADEQUEST 2.0. PD ADEQUEST International Study Group.

Authors:  E F Vonesh; K O Story; W T O'Neill
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Peritoneal sodium mass removal in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis: influence on blood pressure control.

Authors:  O Ortega; P Gallar; A Carreño; M Gutierrez; I Rodriguez; A Oliet; A Vigil; E Gimenez
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.754

10.  Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome on CAPD. A five year longitudinal study.

Authors:  B P Teehan; C R Schleifer; J M Brown; M H Sigler; J Raimondo
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  1990
View more
  1 in total

1.  Simulating inadequate dialysis and its correction using an individualized patient-derived nomogram.

Authors:  Colin T White
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.