Literature DB >> 19609418

The clinical outcomes of 75 consecutive patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis treated by carotid artery stenting.

Joonho Chung1, Yong Sam Shin, Yong Cheol Lim, Sang Kyu Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcome of 75 consecutive patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis and who were treated by carotid artery stenting (CAS) only.
METHODS: From February 2003 to June 2008, there were 78 stents placed in 75 symptomatic patients (mean age : 67.3 years); 69 patients had carotid stenosis >/=70%, and 6 patients had asymptomatic stenosis >/=80%. No carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was performed during the same period. The patients were clinically followed-up for a mean of 20.1 months.
RESULTS: The procedures were technically successful in all cases. Three (3.8%) patients had procedure-related complications. During the 30-day postprocedural period, there were no restenosis or major stroke. Minor stroke was noticed in 3 (3.8%) patients and 1 (1.3%) of the 75 patients suddenly expired 2 days after discharge. There were no new neurological symptoms that developed during the clinical follow-up period. The results of our series were not inferior to those the previously published in CAS studies, and in fact they were better.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that CAS may be safe and useful for the treatment of cervical carotid artery stenosis when it is used as the first line treatment in those institutions that lack enough experience with CEA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery stenosis; Carotid artery stenting; Carotid endarterectomy; Stroke

Year:  2009        PMID: 19609418      PMCID: PMC2711232          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2009.45.6.350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  12 in total

1.  30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  P A Ringleb; J Allenberg; H Brückmann; H-H Eckstein; G Fraedrich; M Hartmann; M Hennerici; O Jansen; G Klein; A Kunze; P Marx; K Niederkorn; W Schmiedt; L Solymosi; R Stingele; H Zeumer; W Hacke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Mas; Gilles Chatellier; Bernard Beyssen; Alain Branchereau; Thierry Moulin; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Vincent Larrue; Michel Lièvre; Didier Leys; Jean-François Bonneville; Jacques Watelet; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; Jean-François Albucher; Alain Viguier; Philippe Piquet; Pierre Garnier; Fausto Viader; Emmanuel Touzé; Maurice Giroud; Hassan Hosseini; Jean-Christophe Pillet; Pascal Favrole; Jean-Philippe Neau; Xavier Ducrocq
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.

Authors:  Ralph L Sacco; Robert Adams; Greg Albers; Mark J Alberts; Oscar Benavente; Karen Furie; Larry B Goldstein; Philip Gorelick; Jonathan Halperin; Robert Harbaugh; S Claiborne Johnston; Irene Katzan; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Edgar J Kenton; Michael Marks; Lee H Schwamm; Thomas Tomsick
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Stent angioplasty for cervical carotid artery stenosis in high-risk symptomatic NASCET-ineligible patients.

Authors:  A M Malek; R T Higashida; C C Phatouros; T E Lempert; P M Meyers; W S Smith; C F Dowd; V V Halbach
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.

Authors:  T Brott; H P Adams; C P Olinger; J R Marler; W G Barsan; J Biller; J Spilker; R Holleran; R Eberle; V Hertzberg
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases.

Authors:  M Maynar; S Baldi; R Rostagno; T Zander; M Rabellino; R Llorens; J Alvarez; F Barajas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study.

Authors:  Barry T Katzen; Frank J Criado; Stephen R Ramee; Douglas W Massop; L Nick Hopkins; Dennis Donohoe; Sidney A Cohen; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk factors for developing large emboli following carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Sae Min Kwon; Jin Hwan Cheong; Sang Kook Lee; Dong Woo Park; Jae Min Kim; Choong Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-03-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.