Literature DB >> 11108767

Stent angioplasty for cervical carotid artery stenosis in high-risk symptomatic NASCET-ineligible patients.

A M Malek1, R T Higashida, C C Phatouros, T E Lempert, P M Meyers, W S Smith, C F Dowd, V V Halbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) has shown carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to be protective compared with medical therapy alone, its stringent eligibility criteria excluded patients with severe medical, angiographic, and neurological risk factors. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of stent angioplasty in this high-risk subset for whom the perioperative morbidity and mortality of surgery are elevated.
METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive symptomatic NASCET-ineligible patients (10 female; median age, 72.2 years) underwent microcatheter-based carotid stent angioplasty. Half of the patients had sustained a previous stroke. Classification of surgical risk by Sundt criteria yielded no patients in grade 1, 3 patients in grade 2 (10.7%), 8 in grade 3 (28.6%), and 17 (60.7%) in grade 4. Stratification of stroke risk for medical therapy according to the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) 5-point score showed 8 patients with a score of 3 (28.6%), 12 with 4 (42.8%), and 8 with 5 (28.6%). Follow-up was obtained in all patients at a median of 14 months.
RESULTS: The procedure was technically successful in all cases (100%), with immediate stenosis reduction from a mean of 80.3% to 2.7%. There were no periprocedural deaths, 1 major stroke (3.6%), no minor strokes, and 3 transient ischemic attacks (10.7%). In-hospital complications included 2 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, 1 case of acute renal failure, and 1 groin hematoma requiring transfusion. There were 5 deaths during the follow-up period, all beyond 30 days after the procedure: 3 from cardiac causes, 1 from lung cancer, and 1 following unrelated surgery. The patient with major stroke died at 7.8 months during rehabilitation. No surviving patients had further strokes, and all except 1 (95.5%) remained asymptomatic. Anatomic follow-up in 20 patients showed occlusion in 2 (10%) (1 symptomatic, 1 asymptomatic) and intimal hyperplasia in 3 asymptomatic patients (15%).
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results and sustained freedom from symptoms and stroke during the short available follow-up period suggest that stent angioplasty may be useful in the treatment of symptomatic cervical carotid stenosis in high-risk patients despite a notable incidence of restenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108767     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.12.3029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  17 in total

1.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Extracranial Revascularization Therapy: Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Alexander V. Khaw; H. Christian Schumacher; Philip M. Meyers; Rishi Gupta; Randall T. Higashida
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-06

3.  Staged carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy for bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis. Preliminary experience.

Authors:  H Fukuda; K Iihara; N Sakai; K Murao; H Sakai; T Higashi; S Kogure; J Takahashi; K Hayashi; I Nagata
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  The clinical outcomes of 75 consecutive patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis treated by carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Joonho Chung; Yong Sam Shin; Yong Cheol Lim; Sang Kyu Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-06-30

Review 5.  Carotid Stenting in Neuroradiology : A Short Journey from the Past to Current Debates.

Authors:  Joachim Berkefeld; Marlies Wagner; Richard du Mesnil
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Follow-up study on in-stent thrombosis after carotid stenting using multidetector CT angiography.

Authors:  Hirotaka Watarai; Yasuhiko Kaku; Mikito Yamada; Jouji Kokuzawa; Toshiki Tanaka; Takashi Andoh; Toru Iwama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Acute and prophylactic endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Oliver Wittkugel
Journal:  Klin Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-05-15

8.  Contrast-enhanced carotid color-coded duplex sonography for carotid stenting follow-up assessment.

Authors:  Kazumichi Yoshida; Kazuhiko Nozaki; Ken-Ichiro Kikuta; Akiyo Sadato; Susumu Miyamoto; Nobuo Hashimoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Factors predictive of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Kaku; Shin-ichi Yoshimura; Jouji Kokuzawa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  High-concentration contrast media (HCCM) in CT angiography of the carotid system: impact on therapeutic decision making.

Authors:  Bernhard Schuknecht
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.