Literature DB >> 19609231

Impact of a rinse step on protein removal from silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Andrew D Pucker1, Jason J Nichols.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of the rinse step in "no rub" contact lens care systems relative to its ability to assist in removing loosely associated and bound tear film proteins from a worn silicone hydrogel lens.
METHODS: After informed consent, subjects were fitted with lotrafilcon B contact lenses (CIBA Vision). If the fit was acceptable, subjects were asked to wear the lenses on a daily wear basis for 5 (+2, -0) days for an outcome visit. Subjects were instructed to use AQuify Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (CIBA Vision) following the manufacturer's "no rub" instructions. At the outcome visit, contact lenses were then collected by a gloved examiner, with a sterile metal forceps, who rinsed the right lens but did not rinse the left lens on removal from the eyes. Protein was extracted with a 50:50 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid-acetonitrile solution and quantified using a Bradford analyses.
RESULTS: Twenty contact lens wearers were enrolled in this study. For the non-rinsed lenses, the first extraction yielded 13.4 +/- 9.2 microg/lens of protein, whereas the second extraction yielded 5.8 +/- 2.8 microg/lens of protein. For the rinsed lenses, the first extraction yielded an average of 3.0 +/- 1.9 microg/lens of protein, whereas the second extraction yielded an average of 4.0 +/- 2.3 microg/lens. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed a significant interaction (F-statistic = 18.9, p < 0.0001) between the rinse of a lens and extraction number.
CONCLUSIONS: Rinsing a contact lens after removal from the eye removes well more than one-half of the protein associated with it. Further, to biochemically recover all protein from a silicone hydrogel lens, it may be important to perform more than one chemical extraction from it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19609231      PMCID: PMC2915402          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181b2f417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  24 in total

1.  Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition.

Authors:  D E Hart
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  The effect of charged groups on protein interactions with poly(HEMA) hydrogels.

Authors:  Megan S Lord; Martina H Stenzel; Anne Simmons; Bruce K Milthorpe
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers.

Authors:  M R Allansmith; D R Korb; J V Greiner; A S Henriquez; M A Simon; V M Finnemore
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Modulation of bacterial adhesion to hydrogel contact lenses by albumin.

Authors:  R L Taylor; M D Willcox; T J Williams; J Verran
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses.

Authors:  L Jones; A Mann; K Evans; V Franklin; B Tighe
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Deposition rates and lens care influence on galyfilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses.

Authors:  Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses.

Authors:  L Jones; K Evans; R Sariri; V Franklin; B Tighe
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1997-04

8.  The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels.

Authors:  C E Soltys-Robitaille; D M Ammon; P L Valint; G L Grobe
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

Authors:  K W Gellatly; N A Brennan; N Efron
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1988-12

10.  Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials.

Authors:  Laurent Kodjikian; Emmanuelle Casoli-Bergeron; Florence Malet; Hélène Janin-Manificat; Jean Freney; Carole Burillon; Joseph Colin; Jean-Paul Steghens
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  2 in total

1.  Composition of incubation solution impacts in vitro protein uptake to silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Salsabeel Jadi; Miriam Heynen; Doerte Luensmann; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.367

2.  Quantification of individual proteins in silicone hydrogel contact lens deposits.

Authors:  Negar Babaei Omali; Zhenjun Zhao; Hua Zhu; Daniel Tilia; Mark D P Willcox
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.367

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.