Literature DB >> 11100888

An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses.

L Jones1, A Mann, K Evans, V Franklin, B Tighe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the degree and rate of deposition of protein and lipid on FDA group II and group IV contact lens materials over a period of up to 28 days of wear.
METHODS: Twenty-two subjects wore a group IV lens (Acuvue) and a group II lens (Soflens 66) in a randomized, cross-over study. The lenses were randomly worn for periods between 1 and 28 days and then collected for laboratory-based deposition analysis.
RESULTS: The group II lenses revealed an increased degree of lipoidal spoilage (p < 0.0001) and the group IV lenses exhibited increased protein spoilage (p < 0.0001). Surface protein for both materials reached a maximum after 1 day and did not increase over the 4-week wearing period (p = NS). Total protein for group IV lenses reached a maximum between 1 and 7 days and then reached a plateau, with no further increase occurring (p = NS), whereas total protein accumulation on the group II lens continued to increase across all time periods (p < 0.05). Lipid deposition on the group IV lens was maximal after 1 day and increased no further (p = NS), whereas lipid deposition on the group II material monotonously increased and progressively built-up over the 4 weeks of wear (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The kinetics of contact lens deposition is mediated by the chemical structure of the contact lens material under consideration. Protein deposition occurs rapidly with group IV materials before reaching a maximum, whereas N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II materials progressively accumulate protein and lipid deposits, with no plateau occurring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11100888     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200010000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  8 in total

1.  The association of contact lens solution use and Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Authors:  Charlotte E Joslin; Elmer Y Tu; Megan E Shoff; Gregory C Booton; Paul A Fuerst; Timothy T McMahon; Robert J Anderson; Mark S Dworkin; Joel Sugar; Faith G Davis; Leslie T Stayner
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on tear film lipids and lipid-protein interactions in health and disease.

Authors:  Kari B Green-Church; Igor Butovich; Mark Willcox; Douglas Borchman; Friedrich Paulsen; Stefano Barabino; Ben J Glasgow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The Glycoprotein 340's Scavenger Receptor Cysteine-Rich Domain Promotes Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Contact Lens Polymers.

Authors:  Kwaku A Osei; Joshua L Mieher; Manisha Patel; Jason J Nichols; Champion Deivanayagam
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Impact of a rinse step on protein removal from silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Andrew D Pucker; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Treatment, material, care, and patient-related factors in contact lens-related dry eye.

Authors:  Padmapriya Ramamoorthy; Loraine T Sinnott; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Quantification of individual proteins in silicone hydrogel contact lens deposits.

Authors:  Negar Babaei Omali; Zhenjun Zhao; Hua Zhu; Daniel Tilia; Mark D P Willcox
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.367

7.  Proteomic analysis of protein deposits on worn daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Authors:  Zhenjun Zhao; Xiaojia Wei; Yulina Aliwarga; Nicole A Carnt; Qian Garrett; Mark D P Willcox
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses of contact lens deposition.

Authors:  Kari B Green-Church; Jason J Nichols
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.367

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.