Literature DB >> 19608833

A comparison between sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery.

Giuseppina Magni1, Italia La Rosa, Guido Melillo, Angela Savio, Giovanni Rosa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Desflurane in neurosurgery may be beneficial because it facilitates postoperative early neurologic evaluation. However, its use has been debated because of its capacity to promote cerebral vasodilatation. Sevoflurane has been extensively used in neurosurgical patients. In this prospective clinical trial, we compared early postoperative recovery and cognitive function in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial expanding lesions and receiving sevoflurane or desflurane anesthesia.
METHODS: One hundred twenty patients, ASA physical status I-III (66 men), Glascow Coma Scale 15, undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial expanding lesions were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to two anesthetic regimens. In Group S (60 patients, 52 +/- 16 yr), anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane with end-tidal of 1.5%-2% and was age adjusted to obtain approximately 1.2 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration. In Group D (60 patients, 60 +/- 14 yr), anesthesia was maintained using desflurane with end-tidal of 6%-7% and was age adjusted to obtain approximately 1.2 minimum alveolar concentration. Emergence time was measured as the time from drug discontinuation to the time at which patients opened their eyes; tracheal extubation time was measured as the time from anesthetic discontinuation and tracheal extubation. Recovery time was measured as the time elapsing from discontinuation of anesthetic and the time when patients were able to recall their name and date of birth. Cognitive behavior was evaluated with the Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test. In the postanesthesia care unit, a blinded observer monitored the patients for 3 h; the incidence of hemodynamic events, pain, nausea, and shivering requiring rescue medication was recorded.
RESULTS: The mean emergence time (12.2 +/- 4.9 min in Group S vs 10.8 +/- 7.2 min in Group D; P = ns) was similar in the two groups, whereas the mean extubation time and recovery time were longer in Group S (15.2 +/- 3.0 min in Group S vs 11.3 +/- 3.9 min in Group D and 18.2 +/- 2.3 min in Group S vs 12.4 +/- 7.7 min in Group D, respectively; P < 0.001). The Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test score differed between the two groups only at the earliest assessment (15 min after extubation). No difference between the two groups was found in pain, shivering, nausea, vomiting, and incidence of postoperative hemodynamic events.
CONCLUSION: Patients who received desflurane had a shorter extubation and recovery time but similar intraoperative and postoperative incidence of complications compared with those who received sevoflurane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19608833     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac1265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  22 in total

1.  Recovery of postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients after a long duration of desflurane anesthesia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shunsuke Tachibana; Tomo Hayase; Michiko Osuda; Satoshi Kazuma; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Postoperative Delirium Prevention.

Authors:  Christopher G Hughes; Christina S Boncyk; Deborah J Culley; Lee A Fleisher; Jacqueline M Leung; David L McDonagh; Tong J Gan; Matthew D McEvoy; Timothy E Miller
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Bispectral index and their relation with consciousness of the patients who receive desflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia during wake-up test for spinal surgery for correction.

Authors:  Tae Kyoung Seol; Min Kyu Han; Hee Jong Lee; Mi Ae Cheong; Jong Hun Jun
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-01-25

Review 4.  Integrative review: postcraniotomy pain in the brain tumour patient.

Authors:  Rebecca Elizabeth Guilkey; Diane Von Ah; Janet S Carpenter; Cynthia Stone; Claire B Draucker
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Remote cerebellar hemorrhage after unruptured cerebral aneurysm surgery: two cases report.

Authors:  Sang Hee Ha; Eun Mi Kim; Hyang Mi Ju; Woo Kyung Lee; Kyeong Tae Min
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-09-24

6.  A comparison of 1 minimum alveolar concentration desflurane and 1 minimum alveolar concentration isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions.

Authors:  Karamehmet Yildiz; Cihangir Bicer; Recep Aksu; Kudret Dogru; Halit Madenoglu; Adem Boyaci
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2011-04

Review 7.  Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.

Authors:  Anthony G Messina; Michael Wang; Marshall J Ward; Chase C Wilker; Brett B Smith; Daniel P Vezina; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-18

8.  Research studies that have influenced practice of neuroanesthesiology in recent years: A literature review.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Mihir P Pandia; Hari Hara Dash
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03

9.  Desflurane - revisited.

Authors:  Mukul Chandra Kapoor; Mahesh Vakamudi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01

10.  Comparison between sevoflurane and desflurane on emergence and recovery characteristics of children undergoing surgery for spinal dysraphism.

Authors:  Priyanka Gupta; Girija Prasad Rath; Hemanshu Prabhakar; Parmod Kumar Bithal
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.