Literature DB >> 24648575

A comparison of 1 minimum alveolar concentration desflurane and 1 minimum alveolar concentration isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions.

Karamehmet Yildiz1, Cihangir Bicer2, Recep Aksu2, Kudret Dogru2, Halit Madenoglu2, Adem Boyaci2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A critical point in craniotomy is during opening of the dura and the subsequent potential for cerebral edema. Use of desflurane in neurosurgery may be beneficial because it facilitates early postoperative neurologic evaluation; however, data on the effect of desflurane on intracranial pressure in humans are limited. Isoflurane has been used extensively in neurosurgical patients.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) desflurane with 1 MAC isoflurane in facilitating hemodynamic stability, brain relaxation, and postoperative recovery characteristics in patients who underwent craniotomy for supratentorial lesions.
METHODS: A total of 70 patients (aged 18-65 years), with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 or 2 physical status, who underwent craniotomy for supratentorial lesions, were enrolled in the study. For induction of anesthesia, fentanyl (2 μg/kg IV) and propofol (2 mg/kg IV) were administered. Endotracheal intubation was performed after administration of vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg IV) for total muscle relaxation. Before insertion of the skull pins, additional fentanyl (2 μg/kg IV) was administered. Patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 anesthetic regimens. For maintenance of anesthesia, 35 patients received 1 MAC of desflurane (group 1) and 35 patients received 1 MAC of isoflurane (group 2) within 50% oxygen in nitrous oxide. Intraoperatively, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured and recorded before induction and 1 minute after induction, after endotracheal intubation, before skull pin insertion and 1 minute after skull pin insertion, before incision and 1 minute after incision, and before extubation and 1 minute after extubation. Also, HR and MAP were recorded at 30-minute intervals. Postoperatively, extubation time, eye opening time to verbal stimuli, orientation time, and time to reach an Aldrete postanesthetic recovery score of ≥8 were recorded. In addition, opioid consumption was calculated and recorded. Brain relaxation was evaluated according to a 4-step brain relaxation scoring scale. All outcomes of the study were assessed and recorded by an anesthesiologist blinded to the volatile anesthetic gases studied.
RESULTS: No significant difference in HR was observed between the 2 groups. Intraoperative MAP values in group 1 were higher than in group 2 (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between these groups in brain relaxation and opioid consumption. Extubation time, eye opening time to verbal stimuli, and time to reach an Aldrete score of ≥8 were found to be significantly shorter in patients in group 1 compared with patients in group 2 (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent craniotomy for supratentorial lesions, patients who received 1 MAC desflurane-based anesthesia had earlier postoperative cognitive recovery and postoperative neurologic examination compared with patients who received 1 MAC isoflurane-based anesthesia. The observed benefits of early recovery from anesthesia, however, should be considered with risks such as higher MAP in patients administered 1 MAC desflurane.

Entities:  

Keywords:  desflurane; hemodynamic stability; isoflurane; neuroanesthesia; postoperative recovery

Year:  2011        PMID: 24648575      PMCID: PMC3955242          DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2011.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp        ISSN: 0011-393X


  19 in total

Review 1.  Anesthesia for patients with neurologic disease.

Authors:  Stephen A Greene
Journal:  Top Companion Anim Med       Date:  2010-05

2.  Desflurane and isoflurane increase lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure in normocapnic patients undergoing transsphenoidal hypophysectomy.

Authors:  P Talke; J Caldwell; B Dodsont; C A Richardson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  The effects of isoflurane and desflurane on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and cerebral arteriovenous oxygen content difference in normocapnic patients with supratentorial brain tumors.

Authors:  Marcial Fraga; Pablo Rama-Maceiras; Sara Rodiño; Humberto Aymerich; Pilar Pose; Javier Belda
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Recovery and neurological evaluation.

Authors:  Neus Fàbregas; Nicolas Bruder
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2007-12

5.  Elderly patients recover more rapidly from desflurane than from isoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  J A Bennett; N Lingaraju; J C Horrow; T McElrath; M M Keykhah
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.452

6.  Dynamic and static cerebral autoregulation during isoflurane, desflurane, and propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  S Strebel; A M Lam; B Matta; T S Mayberg; R Aaslid; D W Newell
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Early postoperative cognitive recovery and gas exchange patterns after balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane or desflurane in overweight and obese patients undergoing craniotomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Federico Bilotta; Andrea Doronzio; Vincenzo Cuzzone; Remo Caramia; Giovanni Rosa
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.956

8.  The comparative effects of desflurane and isoflurane on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors.

Authors:  Alan David Kaye; Alan Kaye; Ian J Kucera; James Heavner; Adrian Gelb; Muhamed Anwar; Marilyn Duban; A Salam Arif; Rosemary Craen; Cheng-Tao Chang; Raul Trillo; Marc Hoffman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide.

Authors:  M M Todd; D S Warner; M D Sokoll; M A Maktabi; B J Hindman; F L Scamman; J Kirschner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Effects of 0.5 and 1.0 MAC isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures in children.

Authors:  S Sponheim; Ø Skraastad; E Helseth; B Due-Tønnesen; G Aamodt; H Breivik
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of avoiding neuromuscular blocking agents during maintenance of anaesthesia on recovery characteristics in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions: A randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Ruchi A Jain; Anita N Shetty; Shrikanta P Oak; Anjana S Wajekar; Madhu B Garasia
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-01

2.  Comparison of intravenous labetalol and bupivacaine scalp block on the hemodynamic and entropy changes following skull pin application: A randomized, open label clinical trial.

Authors:  Sidhesh Bharne; Prasanna Udupi Bidkar; Ashok Shankar Badhe; Satyen Parida; Andi Sadayandi Ramesh
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.