Literature DB >> 19608766

The combined status of ATM and p53 link tumor development with therapeutic response.

Hai Jiang1, H Christian Reinhardt, Jirina Bartkova, Johanna Tommiska, Carl Blomqvist, Heli Nevanlinna, Jiri Bartek, Michael B Yaffe, Michael T Hemann.   

Abstract

While the contribution of specific tumor suppressor networks to cancer development has been the subject of considerable recent study, it remains unclear how alterations in these networks are integrated to influence the response of tumors to anti-cancer treatments. Here, we show that mechanisms commonly used by tumors to bypass early neoplastic checkpoints ultimately determine chemotherapeutic response and generate tumor-specific vulnerabilities that can be exploited with targeted therapies. Specifically, evaluation of the combined status of ATM and p53, two commonly mutated tumor suppressor genes, can help to predict the clinical response to genotoxic chemotherapies. We show that in p53-deficient settings, suppression of ATM dramatically sensitizes tumors to DNA-damaging chemotherapy, whereas, conversely, in the presence of functional p53, suppression of ATM or its downstream target Chk2 actually protects tumors from being killed by genotoxic agents. Furthermore, ATM-deficient cancer cells display strong nononcogene addiction to DNA-PKcs for survival after DNA damage, such that suppression of DNA-PKcs in vivo resensitizes inherently chemoresistant ATM-deficient tumors to genotoxic chemotherapy. Thus, the specific set of alterations induced during tumor development plays a dominant role in determining both the tumor response to conventional chemotherapy and specific susceptibilities to targeted therapies in a given malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19608766      PMCID: PMC2725944          DOI: 10.1101/gad.1815309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  60 in total

1.  DNA damage-activated kinase Chk2 is independent of proliferation or differentiation yet correlates with tissue biology.

Authors:  C Lukas; J Bartkova; L Latella; J Falck; N Mailand; T Schroeder; M Sehested; J Lukas; J Bartek
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage.

Authors:  Seong-Tae Kim; Bo Xu; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  A CHEK2 genetic variant contributing to a substantial fraction of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Pia Vahteristo; Jirina Bartkova; Hannaleena Eerola; Kirsi Syrjäkoski; Salla Ojala; Outi Kilpivaara; Anitta Tamminen; Juha Kononen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Päivi Heikkilä; Kaija Holli; Carl Blomqvist; Jiri Bartek; Olli-P Kallioniemi; Heli Nevanlinna
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-28       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Somatic activation of the K-ras oncogene causes early onset lung cancer in mice.

Authors:  L Johnson; K Mercer; D Greenbaum; R T Bronson; D Crowley; D A Tuveson; T Jacks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Synthetic lethality between mutation in Atm and DNA-PK(cs) during murine embryogenesis.

Authors:  K E Gurley; C J Kemp
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  S Burma; B P Chen; M Murphy; A Kurimasa; D J Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Q Liu; S Guntuku; X S Cui; S Matsuoka; D Cortez; K Tamai; G Luo; S Carattini-Rivera; F DeMayo; A Bradley; L A Donehower; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  ATM protein expression correlates with radioresistance in primary glioblastoma cells in culture.

Authors:  S Tribius; A Pidel; D Casper
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database.

Authors:  Audrey Petitjean; Ewy Mathe; Shunsuke Kato; Chikashi Ishioka; Sean V Tavtigian; Pierre Hainaut; Magali Olivier
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  L B Schultz; N H Chehab; A Malikzay; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12-25       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  138 in total

1.  A subset of platinum-containing chemotherapeutic agents kills cells by inducing ribosome biogenesis stress.

Authors:  Peter M Bruno; Yunpeng Liu; Ga Young Park; Junko Murai; Catherine E Koch; Timothy J Eisen; Justin R Pritchard; Yves Pommier; Stephen J Lippard; Michael T Hemann
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Bone marrow failure in Fanconi anemia is triggered by an exacerbated p53/p21 DNA damage response that impairs hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Authors:  Raphael Ceccaldi; Kalindi Parmar; Enguerran Mouly; Marc Delord; Jung Min Kim; Marie Regairaz; Marika Pla; Nadia Vasquez; Qing-Shuo Zhang; Corinne Pondarre; Régis Peffault de Latour; Eliane Gluckman; Marina Cavazzana-Calvo; Thierry Leblanc; Jérôme Larghero; Markus Grompe; Gérard Socié; Alan D D'Andrea; Jean Soulier
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 3.  Is post-transcriptional stabilization, splicing and translation of selective mRNAs a key to the DNA damage response?

Authors:  H Christian Reinhardt; Ian G Cannell; Sandra Morandell; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Oxidative stress as a therapeutic perspective for ATM-deficient chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.

Authors:  Veronika Navrkalova; Leona Raskova Kafkova; Vladimir Divoky; Sarka Pospisilova
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  A mammalian functional-genetic approach to characterizing cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Hai Jiang; Justin R Pritchard; Richard T Williams; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Michael T Hemann
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 15.040

6.  Spontaneous abrogation of the G₂DNA damage checkpoint has clinical benefits but promotes leukemogenesis in Fanconi anemia patients.

Authors:  Raphael Ceccaldi; Delphine Briot; Jérôme Larghero; Nadia Vasquez; Catherine Dubois d'Enghien; Delphine Chamousset; Maria-Elena Noguera; Quinten Waisfisz; Olivier Hermine; Corinne Pondarre; Thierry Leblanc; Eliane Gluckman; Hans Joenje; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Gérard Socié; Jean Soulier
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Selective killing of ATM- or p53-deficient cancer cells through inhibition of ATR.

Authors:  Philip M Reaper; Matthew R Griffiths; Joanna M Long; Jean-Damien Charrier; Somhairle Maccormick; Peter A Charlton; Julian M C Golec; John R Pollard
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 15.040

8.  Wild-type H- and N-Ras promote mutant K-Ras-driven tumorigenesis by modulating the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Elda Grabocka; Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta; Mathew J K Jones; Veronica Lubkov; Eyoel Yemanaberhan; Laura Taylor; Hao Hsuan Jeng; Dafna Bar-Sagi
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Non-small cell lung cancer is susceptible to induction of DNA damage responses and inhibition of angiogenesis by telomere overhang oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Neelu Puri; Ryan T Pitman; Richard E Mulnix; Terrianne Erickson; Audra N Iness; Connie Vitali; Yutong Zhao; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 8.679

10.  Depletion of ATR selectively sensitizes ATM-deficient human mammary epithelial cells to ionizing radiation and DNA-damaging agents.

Authors:  Yuxia Cui; Stela S Palii; Cynthia L Innes; Richard S Paules
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.