Literature DB >> 19608666

Patterns of survival and causes of death following a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a population-based study.

Sigurdur Y Kristinsson1, Magnus Björkholm, Therese M-L Andersson, Sandra Eloranta, Paul W Dickman, Lynn R Goldin, Cecilie Blimark, Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist, Anders Wahlin, Ingemar Turesson, Ola Landgren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on survival patterns among patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared the survival of 4,259 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, collected from hematology outpatient units in Sweden, with the survival of the general population by computing relative survival ratios. We also compared causes of death in these patients with those in 16,151 matched controls.
RESULTS: One-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year relative survival ratios were 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), 0.93 (0.91-0.95), 0.82 (0.79-0.84), and 0.70 (0.64-0.76), respectively. Younger age at diagnosis of the gammopathy was associated with a significantly lower excess mortality compared to that in older patients (p<0.001). The excess mortality among patients with gammopathy increased with longer follow-up (p<0.0001). IgM (versus IgG/A) gammopathy was associated with a superior survival (p=0.038). Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance had an increased risk of dying from multiple myeloma (hazards ratio (HR)=553; 95% CI 77-3946), Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (HR=infinity), other lymphoproliferative malignancies (6.5; 2.8-15.1), other hematologic malignancies (22.9; 8.9-58.7), amyloidosis (HR=infinity), bacterial infections (3.4; 1.7-6.7), ischemic heart disease (1.3; 1.1-1.4), other heart disorders (1.5; 1.2-1.8), other hematologic conditions (6.9; 2.7-18), liver (2.1; 1.1-4.2), and renal diseases (3.2; 2.0-4.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Our finding of decreased life expectancy in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, which was most pronounced in the elderly and explained by both malignant transformation and non-malignant causes, is of importance in the understanding and clinical management of this disease. The underlying mechanisms may be causally related to the gammopathy, but may also be explained by underlying disease that led to the detection of the hematologic disease. Our results are of importance since they give a true estimation of survival in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance diagnosed in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19608666      PMCID: PMC2791946          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.010066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  22 in total

1.  Mortality and causes of death in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  H Gregersen; J Ibsen; L Mellemkjoer; J Dahlerup; J Olsen; H T Sørensen
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Regression models for relative survival.

Authors:  Paul W Dickman; Andy Sloggett; Michael Hills; Timo Hakulinen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Terry M Therneau; S Vincent Rajkumar; Janice R Offord; Dirk R Larson; Matthew F Plevak; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Long-term follow-up of 241 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: the original Mayo Clinic series 25 years later.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Terry M Therneau; S Vincent Rajkumar; Dirk R Larson; Matthew F Plevak; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Risk of plasma cell and lymphoproliferative disorders among 14621 first-degree relatives of 4458 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in Sweden.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Lynn R Goldin; Neil E Caporaso; Cecilie Blimark; Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist; Anders Wahlin; Magnus Bjorkholm; Ingemar Turesson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patient withdrawal.

Authors:  T Hakulinen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Natural history in 241 cases.

Authors:  R A Kyle
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Long-term follow-up of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Terry M Therneau; S Vincent Rajkumar; Ellen D Remstein; Janice R Offord; Dirk R Larson; Matthew F Plevak; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Malignant transformation of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among out-patients of a community hospital in southeastern Netherlands.

Authors:  M H van de Poel; J W Coebergh; H F Hillen
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  33 in total

1.  Incidental finding of monoclonal gammopathy in blood donors: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Massimo La Raja; Monica Barcobello; Nicola Bet; Paolo Dolfini; Marina Florean; Federica Tomasella; Vincenzo De Angelis; Luca Mascaretti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network.

Authors:  Niels W C J van de Donk; Antonio Palumbo; Hans Erik Johnsen; Monika Engelhardt; Francesca Gay; Henrik Gregersen; Roman Hajek; Martina Kleber; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Pellegrino Musto; Torben Plesner; Orhan Sezer; Evangelos Terpos; Anders Waage; Sonja Zweegman; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Henk M Lokhorst
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Renal recovery with lenalidomide in a patient with bortezomib-resistant multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Niklas Zojer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Arterial and venous thrombosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Magnus Björkholm; Lynn R Goldin; Sam Schulman; Cecilie Blimark; Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist; Anders Wahlin; Ingemar Turesson; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  The significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  MGUS to myeloma: a mysterious gammopathy of underexplored significance.

Authors:  Madhav V Dhodapkar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Precursors to lymphoproliferative malignancies.

Authors:  Lynn R Goldin; Mary L McMaster; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Familial associations of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance with autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  K Hemminki; A Försti; K Sundquist; J Sundquist; X Li
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Risk factors for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maira A Castaneda-Avila; Christine M Ulbricht; Mara Meyer Epstein
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 10.  What is the significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance?

Authors:  Catherine Atkin; Alex Richter; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.