Literature DB >> 19605604

Nurses' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions in medical practice: a nationwide study in Flanders, Belgium.

E Inghelbrecht1, J Bilsen, F Mortier, L Deliens.   

Abstract

We investigated on a nationwide level the attitudes of nurses towards end-of-life decisions (ELDs) that may hasten death and towards their role in those decisions. We took a representative random sample of 6000 nurses in Flanders, Belgium. Response rate was 62.5%. Most nurses agreed with the practice of withholding/withdrawing potentially life-prolonging treatments (93%), with decisions to alleviate symptoms with possible life-shortening side effects (96%) and with the practice of euthanasia (92%). Their support for the different decisions existed regardless of whether they had cared for terminally ill patients or not. Most nurses also thought that they have an important role to play especially in the ELD-making process. Nurses' views on their proper role in the administration of drugs in euthanasia and continuous deep sedation showed a large dispersal. Overall, nurses' work setting determines their opinions on nurses' role in ELDs. In conclusion, nurses accept a wide variety of ELDs being practiced with terminally ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19605604     DOI: 10.1177/0269216309106810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  9 in total

1.  The role of nurses in physician-assisted deaths in Belgium.

Authors:  Els Inghelbrecht; Johan Bilsen; Freddy Mortier; Luc Deliens
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Nurses' attitudes and experiences surrounding palliative sedation: components for developing policy for nursing professionals.

Authors:  Bansari Patel; Rita Gorawara-Bhat; Stacie Levine; Joseph W Shega
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Challenges in the Management of Care of Brain-Dead Patients in the Donation Process: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

Authors:  H YazdiMoghaddam; Z S Manzari; A Heydari; E Mohammadi
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2020

Review 4.  A systematic review of religious beliefs about major end-of-life issues in the five major world religions.

Authors:  Rajshekhar Chakraborty; Areej R El-Jawahri; Mark R Litzow; Karen L Syrjala; Aric D Parnes; Shahrukh K Hashmi
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2017-10

Review 5.  Culture and end of life care: a scoping exercise in seven European countries.

Authors:  Marjolein Gysels; Natalie Evans; Arantza Meñaca; Erin Andrew; Franco Toscani; Sylvia Finetti; H Roeline Pasman; Irene Higginson; Richard Harding; Robert Pool
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Attitudes toward Euthanasia and Related Issues among Physicians and Patients in a Multi-cultural Society of Malaysia.

Authors:  Mohammad Yousuf Rathor; Mohammad Fauzi Abdul Rani; Mohammad Arif Shahar; A Rehman Jamalludin; Shahrin Tarmizi Bin Che Abdullah; Ahmad Marzuki Bin Omar; Azarisman Shah Bin Mohamad Shah
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2014-07

Review 7.  The impact of the inpatient practice of continuous deep sedation until death on healthcare professionals' emotional well-being: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Ziegler; Hannes Merker; Margareta Schmid; Milo A Puhan
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 8.  Nurses' perspective on their involvement in decision-making about life-prolonging treatments: A quantitative survey study.

Authors:  Susanne A M Arends; Maureen Thodé; Anke J E De Veer; H Roeline W Pasman; Anneke L Francke; Irene P Jongerden
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.057

9.  Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses.

Authors:  Hans Ulrich Bucher; Sabine D Klein; Manya J Hendriks; Ruth Baumann-Hölzle; Thomas M Berger; Jürg C Streuli; Jean-Claude Fauchère
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.125

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.