Literature DB >> 19604296

A generic impact-scoring system applied to alien mammals in Europe.

Wolfgang Nentwig1, Elfi Kühnel, Sven Bacher.   

Abstract

We present a generic scoring system that compares the impact of alien species among members of large taxonomic groups. This scoring can be used to identify the most harmful alien species so that conservation measures to ameliorate their negative effects can be prioritized. For all alien mammals in Europe, we assessed impact reports as completely as possible. Impact was classified as either environmental or economic. We subdivided each of these categories into five subcategories (environmental: impact through competition, predation, hybridization, transmission of disease, and herbivory; economic: impact on agriculture, livestock, forestry, human health, and infrastructure). We assigned all impact reports to one of these 10 categories. All categories had impact scores that ranged from zero (minimal) to five (maximal possible impact at a location). We summed all impact scores for a species to calculate "potential impact" scores. We obtained "actual impact" scores by multiplying potential impact scores by the percentage of area occupied by the respective species in Europe. Finally, we correlated species' ecological traits with the derived impact scores. Alien mammals from the orders Rodentia, Artiodactyla, and Carnivora caused the highest impact. In particular, the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus), muskrat (Ondathra zibethicus), and sika deer (Cervus nippon) had the highest overall scores. Species with a high potential environmental impact also had a strong potential economic impact. Potential impact also correlated with the distribution of a species in Europe. Ecological flexibility (measured as number of different habitats a species occupies) was strongly related to impact. The scoring system was robust to uncertainty in knowledge of impact and could be adjusted with weight scores to account for specific value systems of particular stakeholder groups (e.g., agronomists or environmentalists). Finally, the scoring system is easily applicable and adaptable to other taxonomic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19604296     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01289.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of approaches for estimating relative impacts of nonnative fishes.

Authors:  N W R Lapointe; R M Pendleton; P L Angermeier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Determinants and effects of sinus worm Skrjabingylus nasicola (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidae) infestation in invasive American mink Neovison vison in Germany.

Authors:  M Heddergott; D Pohl; P Steinbach; L Cantú Salazar; F Müller; A C Frantz
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Does human-induced habitat modification influence the impact of introduced species? A case study on cavity-nesting by the introduced common myna (Acridotheres tristis) and two Australian native parrots.

Authors:  Kate Grarock; David B Lindenmayer; Jeffrey T Wood; Christopher R Tidemann
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  The generic impact scoring system (GISS): a standardized tool to quantify the impacts of alien species.

Authors:  Wolfgang Nentwig; Sven Bacher; Petr Pyšek; Montserrat Vilà; Sabrina Kumschick
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  The Global Invasion of the Suckermouth Armored Catfish Genus Pterygoplichthys (Siluriformes: Loricariidae): Annotated List of Species, Distributional Summary, and Assessment of Impacts.

Authors:  Alexander Benjamin Orfinger; Daniel Douglas Goodding
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  Is it benign or is it a Pariah? Empirical evidence for the impact of the common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) on Australian birds.

Authors:  Kate Grarock; Christopher R Tidemann; Jeffrey Wood; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Invasive Insects Differ from Non-Invasive in Their Thermal Requirements.

Authors:  Vojtěch Jarošík; Marc Kenis; Alois Honěk; Jiří Skuhrovec; Petr Pyšek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Contrasting alien effects on native diversity along biotic and abiotic gradients in an arid protected area.

Authors:  Reham F El-Barougy; Ibrahim A Elgamal; Abdel-Hamid A Khedr; Louis-Félix Bersier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Which factors affect the success or failure of eradication campaigns against alien species?

Authors:  Therese Pluess; Vojtěch Jarošík; Petr Pyšek; Ray Cannon; Jan Pergl; Annemarie Breukers; Sven Bacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Impact of Non-Native Birds on Native Ecosystems: A Global Analysis.

Authors:  Valeria L Martin-Albarracin; Guillermo C Amico; Daniel Simberloff; Martin A Nuñez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.