Literature DB >> 19603220

A randomized clinical trial of frozen vs. standard nasogastric tube placement.

Doron Kopelman1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19603220     DOI： 10.1007/s00268-009-0132-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN： 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Nasogastric tube insertion using flexible fibreoptic nasoendoscope.

Authors:  Y G Karagama; J L Lancaster; A Karkanevatos
Journal:  Hosp Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  Passage of a nasogastric tube in an intubated patient facilitated by a video laryngoscope.

Authors:  James R Roberts; Jeffrey Halstead
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 1.484

3.  A randomized clinical trial of frozen vs. standard nasogastric tube placement.

Authors:  Doron Kopelman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Nasogastric tube insertion over a guide wire placed with a thin transnasal endoscope.

Authors:  J M Bordas; J Llach; F Mondelo; J Teres
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Endoscopically guided placement of nasogastric tubes in patients with esophageal carcinoma with absolute dysphagia: report of a 3-year experience.

Authors:  N K Shukla; A K Goel; V Seenu; R Nanda; S V Deo; A K Kriplani
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.454
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial of frozen vs. standard nasogastric tube placement.

Authors:  Doron Kopelman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.