Literature DB >> 19597982

A theoretical model for single blastocyst transfer.

A Teranishi1, A Kuwata, T Fumino, H Hamai, M Shigeta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the relationship between embryo grade and ART outcomes and determine how to decrease multiple pregnancy rates by assigning patients to single embryo transfer (SET) instead of dual embryo transfer (DET) according to embryo grade and/or availability.
DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review.
SETTING: IVF fertility center. PATIENTS: 247 women undergoing day 5 DET after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.
METHODS: We retrospectively investigated embryo grade and outcomes on day 5 DET and calculated theoretical multiple pregnancy rates by assigning patients to SET instead of DET according to a combination of embryo grades and availability. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Implantation, pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, expected pregnancy and expected multiple pregnancy rates.
RESULTS: Embryo grade affects implantation rates so that embryo transfer of at least one embryo with grade > or = 3BB resulted in high multiple pregnancy rates as well as high pregnancy rates. By performing DET, the clinical pregnancy rate was 39.9% with a multiple pregnancy rate of 33.3%; however, had SET been performed with an embryo graded 3BB or better, theoretical calculated pregnancy rates would have dropped to 35.8% but with a multiple pregnancy rate of 7.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our model showed that cases having at least one embryo with grade > or = 3BB might serve as suitable candidates for SET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19597982      PMCID: PMC2729859          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9321-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

1.  UK authority sets limit on number of embryos transferred.

Authors:  Susan Mayor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-10

2.  Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme.

Authors:  Jan Gerris; Diane De Neubourg; Katelijne Mangelschots; Eric Van Royen; Miet Vercruyssen; Jorge Barudy-Vasquez; Marion Valkenburg; Greet Ryckaert
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer.

Authors:  Amin A Milki; Sunny H Jun; Mary D Hinckley; Barry Behr; Linda C Giudice; Lynn M Westphal
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  D K Gardner; M Lane; J Stevens; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Blastocyst-ET and monozygotic twinning.

Authors:  B Behr; J D Fisch; C Racowsky; K Miller; T B Pool; A A Milki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  ESHRE guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories. Committee of the Special Interest Group on Embryology of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M Plachot; R van Kooij; S Al-Hasani; K Dawson; A DeVos; M C Magli; J Mandelbaum; J Selva; W van Inzen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive techniques: a phenomenon independent of micromanipulation.

Authors:  M Schachter; A Raziel; S Friedler; D Strassburger; O Bern; R Ron-El
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Monozygotic twinning associated with day 5 embryo transfer in pregnancies conceived after IVF.

Authors:  Victoria Wright; Laura A Schieve; Anjel Vahratian; Meredith A Reynolds
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  David K Gardner; Eric Surrey; Debra Minjarez; Annette Leitz; John Stevens; William B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  6 in total

1.  Search for morphological indicators that predict implantation by principal component analysis using images of blastocyst.

Authors:  Daisuke Mashiko; Mikiko Tokoro; Masae Kojima; Noritaka Fukunaga; Yoshimasa Asada; Kazuo Yamagata
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.061

2.  Asynchronous division at 4-8-cell stage of preimplantation embryos affects live birth through ICM/TE differentiation.

Authors:  Daisuke Mashiko; Zenki Ikeda; Mikiko Tokoro; Yu Hatano; Tatsuma Yao; Tetsuya J Kobayashi; Noritaka Fukunaga; Yoshimasa Asada; Kazuo Yamagata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Mitochondrial DNA copy number in cumulus cells is a strong predictor of obtaining good-quality embryos after IVF.

Authors:  Mai Ogino; Hiroshi Tsubamoto; Kazuko Sakata; Naoko Oohama; Hitomi Hayakawa; Teruhito Kojima; Minoru Shigeta; Hiroaki Shibahara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Medium-based noninvasive preimplantation genetic diagnosis for human α-thalassemias-SEA.

Authors:  Haitao Wu; Chenhui Ding; Xiaoting Shen; Jing Wang; Rong Li; Bing Cai; Yanwen Xu; Yiping Zhong; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Influence of the insemination method on the outcomes of elective blastocyst culture.

Authors:  Caizhu Wang; Guixue Feng; Bo Zhang; Jinhui Shu; Hong Zhou; Xianyou Gan; Ruoyun Lin
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-06-30

6.  Absence of CD9 reduces endometrial VEGF secretion and impairs uterine repair after parturition.

Authors:  Natsuko Kawano; Kenji Miyado; Noriko Yoshii; Seiya Kanai; Hidekazu Saito; Mami Miyado; Noboru Inagaki; Yasushi Odawara; Toshio Hamatani; Akihiro Umezawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.