Literature DB >> 1959790

Screening as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors based on Icelandic population data, 1964-1988.

K Sigurdsson1, J Hrafnkelsson, G Geirsson, J Gudmundsson, A Salvarsdóttir.   

Abstract

Survival rates were computed for 376 women diagnosed with carcinoma of the uterine cervix between 1964 and 1988. The 5-year survival rate for the entire group was 63%. The effect of age at diagnosis, clinical stage, histopathology, year of diagnosis, and screening program attendance was studied by univariate analysis and simultaneously with a multivariate analysis, the Cox proportional hazards model. All these parameters had a significant effect on survival, with clinical stage as the strongest parameter followed by histology, year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and attendance at screening. Women who had attended the cervical screening program fared significantly better than those who had never attended. Patients treated in the late years of the study period had a significantly better survival rate, possibly indicating improved treatment. Young women had a significantly better prognosis than older women. Women with adenocarcinoma and anaplastic tumors had a significantly worse prognosis than women with squamous and adenosquamous carcinoma. The prognostic effect of screening was mainly attributed to the more favorable distribution of early stages and younger age at diagnosis among the screened women. After all the analyzed parameters had been adjusted for the nonattenders still had poorer prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1959790     DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(91)90011-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  4 in total

1.  Tumor size and lymph node status determined by imaging are reliable factors for predicting advanced cervical cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Min Sun Kyung; Hong Bae Kim; Jung Yeob Seoung; In Young Choi; Young Soo Joo; Me Yeon Lee; Jung Bae Kang; Young Han Park
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Effects of screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in New South Wales implied by influences of period of diagnosis and birth cohort.

Authors:  R J Taylor; S L Morrell; H A Mamoon; G V Wain
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Randomised trial of HPV self-sampling among non-attenders in the Slovenian cervical screening programme ZORA: comparing three different screening approaches.

Authors:  Urska Ivanus; Tine Jerman; Alenka Repse Fokter; Iztok Takac; Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik; Mateja Marcec; Ursula Salobir Gajsek; Maja Pakiz; Jakob Koren; Simona Hutter Celik; Kristina Gornik Kramberger; Ulrika Klopcic; Rajko Kavalar; Simona Sramek Zatler; Biljana Grcar Kuzmanov; Mojca Florjancic; Natasa Nolde; Srdjan Novakovic; Mario Poljak; Maja Primic Zakelj
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Epidemiology and outcome of cervical cancer in national institute of Morocco.

Authors:  Sanaa Elmajjaoui; Nabil Ismaili; Hanane El Kacemi; Tayeb Kebdani; Hassan Sifat; Noureddine Benjaafar
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.