| Literature DB >> 19597816 |
Ali Agool1, Riemer H J A Slart, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Philip M Kluin, Lydia Visser, Pieter L Jager, Edo Vellenga.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Somatostatin receptor expression has been demonstrated on a number of plasma cell lines. Therefore, we questioned whether somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) can be used to demonstrate in vivo multiple myeloma (MM) activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 19597816 PMCID: PMC2791472 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1199-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Patient characteristics at presentation or at relapse
| Patient No. | Age (years) | Sex | Type of underlying disorder | Paraprotein | SRS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | F | MM | IgA-κ | + |
| 2 | 58 | F | MM | IgG-κ | – |
| 3 | 54 | M | MM | IgG-λ | – |
| 4 | 57 | M | MM | FLC-κ | + |
| 5 | 62 | M | MM | IgA-κ | + |
| 6 | 53 | M | MM | IgG-κ | – |
| 7 | 52 | M | MM | IgG-κ | + |
| 8 | 51 | M | MM | IgG-λ | – |
| 9 | 62 | M | MM | IgG-κ | – |
| 10 | 60 | M | Plasmacytoma | IgA-λ | + |
| 11 | 40 | M | Plasmacytoma | IgG-κ | + |
| 12 | 85 | M | MM-R | IgA-κ | + |
| 13 | 56 | F | MM-R | IgG-κ | + |
| 14 | 61 | M | MM-R | IgG-κ | – |
| 15 | 64 | M | MM-R | IgG-κ | + |
| 16 | 55 | M | MM-R | FLC-κ | + |
| 17 | 46 | M | MM-R | FLC-κ | + |
| 18 | 48 | M | MM-R | FLC-λ | + |
| 19 | 70 | M | MM-R | FLC-κ | + |
| 20 | 60 | M | MM-R | IgG-κ | + |
| 21 | 63 | M | MM-R | IgG-κ | + |
| 22 | 63 | M | MM-R | IgG-κ | + |
| 23 | 59 | M | MM-R | IgG-κ | + |
| 24 | 67 | F | MM-R | IgG-λ | – |
| 25 | 48 | M | MM-R | FLC-κ | + |
| 26 | 73 | M | MM-R | NS | – |
| 27 | 65 | F | MM-R | FLC-κ | + |
| 28 | 60 | F | MM-R | FLC-λ | + |
| 29 | 64 | F | MM-R | NS | + |
NS non-secretor, FLC free light chain in serum, MM multiple myeloma, R relapse, SRS somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with a positive (+) or negative (-) scan
Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in multiple myeloma patients receiving upfront treatment or at relapse
| Patient No. | SRS | Corresponding defects on whole-body radiography (Y/N) | Whole-body radiography | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scan pos. | No. of lesions | Uptake ratio | No. lesions > 1 cm | No. lesions < 1 cm | New lytic lesions at relapse > 1 cm | ||
| 1 | + | 1 | 1.5 | Y | 4 | Y | |
| 2 | – | 0 | – | – | 3 | Y | |
| 3 | – | 0 | – | – | 0 | N | |
| 4 | + | 1 | 2 | Y | 3 | Y | |
| 5 | + | 1 | 2.3 | Na | 0 | N | |
| 6 | – | 0 | – | – | 1 | N | |
| 7 | + | 2 | 2.5 | Y | 0 | Y | |
| 8 | – | 0 | – | 0 | Y | ||
| 9 | – | 0 | – | – | 0 | N | |
| 10 | + | 1 | 2 | Na | 0 | N | |
| 11 | + | 1 | 1.5 | Y | 0 | N | |
| 12 | + | 11 | 2 (1.5–2.5) | N | 0 | N | 0 |
| 13 | + | 2 | 2 (1.8–2.2) | N | 0 | N | 0 |
| 14 | – | 0 | – | – | 4 | Y | 1 |
| 15 | + | 1 | 2.5 | Y | 3 | N | 1 |
| 16 | + | 1 | 1.5 | Y | 6 | Y | 1 |
| 17 | + | 1 | 2 | Y | 4 | Y | 1 |
| 18 | + | 3 | 3 (2.8–3.2) | Yb | 3 | Y | 3 |
| 19 | + | Diffuse | n.a. | N | 0 | Y | 0 |
| 20 | + | 12 | 2 (1.5–2.5) | N | 3 | N | 0 |
| 21 | + | 1 | 1.3 | Ya | 2 | Y | 1 |
| 22 | + | 1 | 2 | Y | 5 | Y | 1 |
| 23 | + | 3 | 2 (1.7–2.2) | N | 0 | N | 0 |
| 24 | – | 0 | – | – | 0 | Y | 0 |
| 25 | + | 3 | 2 | N | 5 | N | 0 |
| 26 | – | 0 | – | – | 0 | N | 0 |
| 27 | + | 1 | 2 | N | 5 | Y | 0 |
| 28 | + | 3 | 3 (2.6–3.3) | Nb | 3 | Y | 2 |
| 29 | + | 1 | 1.4 | Na | 0 | Y | 0 |
Lytic lesions larger than 1 cm; osteolytic defects present (Y) or absent (N)
n.a. not available
aNo abnormalities on whole-body radiography, but defects on MRI or CT scan
bExtra-osseous localization
Fig. 1Elevated SRS uptake in the distal right femur matching with the osteolytic lesion on skeletal X-ray (both white arrows). There is no SRS uptake in the osteolytic lesion of the proximal right femur on skeletal X-ray (small black arrow)
Fig. 2Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy of the pelvis posterior view in a patient with multiple myeloma in the left iliac bone, with elevated SRS uptake before treatment (small black arrow) (a) and normalization after treatment (b). The X-ray shows a persistent matching osteolytic bone lesion (small black arrow) (c)
Follow-up results of SRS scan after 3 months of treatment
| Patient No. | Type of paraprotein | Paraprotein level | SRS | Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upfront | Follow-up | Upfront | Follow-upa | ||||
| 1 | FLC-κ | 204 | – | 2 | + | – | VAD |
| 11 | IgG-κ | 37 | – | 4 | + | – | VAD |
| 12 | IgG-κ | 17 | – | 3 | + | – | Thalid/dexa |
| 18 | FLC-λ | 885 | – | 68 | + | +/- | Thalid/dexa |
| 20 | FLC-κ | 382 | – | 40 | + | +/- | Thalid/dexa |
aFollow-up scan was performed 3–4 months after start of treatment with thalidomide (thalid), dexamethasone (dexa) or vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD). Free light chain (FLC) serum level; normal range: FLC-λ 4.4–32 mg/ml; FLC-κ 2.3–20 mg/ml
Immunohistochemistry for somatostatin receptor subtype sstr3
| Patient No. | SRS scan | sstr3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Positive | Heterogeneous |
| 3 | Negative | Heterogeneous |
| 6 | Negative | Negative |
| 11 | Positive | Moderate |
| 23 | Positive | Strong |
| 28 | Positive | Strong |
Expression of somatostatin receptor subtype sst3 was studied on bone marrow material of multiple myeloma patients or extra-osseous manifestation of multiple myeloma. Patient No. reflects the number in Table 1; sst3 staining was quantified semi-quantitatively as described in the “Materials and methods” section. Patient 1 showed mainly negative tumour cells, but within the tumour individual, strongly positive lymphoid cells
Fig. 3a Normal pancreatic tissue showing positive islets and negative exocrine tissue (original magnification ×200). b Patient 1 with mainly negative but incidentally strongly positive tumour cells (see also the insert; original magnification ×400). c Patient 23 with strongly positive tumour cells