Literature DB >> 19595775

An fMRI study of syntactic layers: sentential and lexical aspects of embedding.

Einat Shetreet1, Naama Friedmann, Uri Hadar.   

Abstract

Sentences with embedding are more complex than sentences without embedding, because they contain more syntactic layers in their phrasal architecture. Until now, neuroimaging studies tested embedded sentences that also included syntactic movement. To explore which cortical areas are specifically involved in the processing of syntactic layers, we used embedded sentences that did not include syntactic movement. We compared sentences in which the verb was complemented with an embedded sentence (CP complement) to sentences with noun phrase (NP) complements. The comparison of sentences with and without embedding revealed activations in the left IFG, bilateral temporo-parietal cortices, bilateral MTG, and precuneus. We further examined the effect of embedding at the lexical level. For this, we tested whether verbs that can select CP complements, namely, whose lexical entry includes a CP option, are more complex than verbs that do not select CP complements, even when both verb types appeared in sentences without embedding. The comparison of verbs that can take CP complements with verbs that can take NP complements, when these verbs appeared with prepositional phrase complements, revealed activations in bilateral anterior MTG and precuneus, showing that embedding also affects processing at the lexical level. The results thus show that sentential embedding, even without syntactic movement, loads onto several cortical resources including the left IFG, indicating that the generation of syntactic layers is cognitively costly, and that embedding affects processing at both the sentence and the lexical levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19595775     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  The picture of the linguistic brain: how sharp can it be? Reply to Fedorenko & Kanwisher.

Authors:  Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2010-08

2.  Cortical representation of verbs with optional complements: the theoretical contribution of fMRI.

Authors:  Einat Shetreet; Naama Friedmann; Uri Hadar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Abstract linguistic structure correlates with temporal activity during naturalistic comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan R Brennan; Edward P Stabler; Sarah E Van Wagenen; Wen-Ming Luh; John T Hale
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Structure before meaning: sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization.

Authors:  Johannes Kizach; Anne Mette Nyvad; Ken Ramshøj Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Persuasive discourse impairments in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Zahra Ghayoumi; Fariba Yadegari; Behrooz Mahmoodi-Bakhtiari; Esmaeil Fakharian; Mehdi Rahgozar; Maryam Rasouli
Journal:  Arch Trauma Res       Date:  2015-03-20

6.  The neural correlates of agrammatism: Evidence from aphasic and healthy speakers performing an overt picture description task.

Authors:  Eva Schönberger; Stefan Heim; Elisabeth Meffert; Peter Pieperhoff; Patricia da Costa Avelar; Walter Huber; Ferdinand Binkofski; Marion Grande
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-21

7.  The Localization of Long-Distance Dependency Components: Integrating the Focal-lesion and Neuroimaging Record.

Authors:  Maria M Piñango; Emily Finn; Cheryl Lacadie; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-30

8.  Intra-operative multi-site stimulation: Expanding methodology for cortical brain mapping of language functions.

Authors:  Tal Gonen; Tomer Gazit; Akiva Korn; Adi Kirschner; Daniella Perry; Talma Hendler; Zvi Ram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension.

Authors:  Laura Giglio; Markus Ostarek; Kirsten Weber; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.357

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.