Literature DB >> 19595621

Can in vitro systems capture the characteristic differences between the flexion-extension kinematics of the healthy and TKA knee?

Kartik M Varadarajan1, Rubash E Harry, Todd Johnson, Guoan Li.   

Abstract

In vitro systems provide a powerful means to evaluate the efficacy of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in restoring normal knee kinematics. The Oxford knee rig (OKR) and the robotic knee testing system (RKTS) represent two systems that have been extensively used to study TKA biomechanics. Nonetheless, a frequently asked question is whether in vitro simulations can capture the in vivo behavior of the knee. Here, we compared the flexion-extension kinematics of intact knees and knees after TKA tested on the OKR and RKTS, to results of representative in vivo studies. The goal was to determine if the in vitro systems could capture the key kinematic features of knees in healthy subjects and TKA patients. Results showed that the RKTS and the OKR can replicate the femoral rollback and 'screw home' tibial rotation between 0 degrees and 30 degrees flexion seen in healthy subjects, and the reduced femoral rollback and absence of 'screw home' motion in TKA patients. The RKTS also replicated the overall internally rotated position of the tibia beyond 30 degrees flexion. However, ability of the OKR to replicate the internally rotated position of the knee beyond 30 degrees flexion was inconsistent. These data could aid in validation of new in vitro systems and physiologic interpretations of in vitro results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19595621     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  8 in total

1.  Influence of bi- and tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty on the kinematics of the knee joint.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Jiahsuan Lo; Torsten Dilger; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Gender differences in tibio-femoral kinematics and quadriceps muscle force during weight-bearing knee flexion in vitro.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effect of geometric variations in posterior-stabilized knee designs on motion characteristics measured in a knee loading machine.

Authors:  Peter S Walker; Michael T Lowry; Anoop Kumar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  ACL substitution may improve kinematics of PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas Zumbrunn; Michael P Duffy; Harry E Rubash; Henrik Malchau; Orhun K Muratoglu; Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Impact of femoro-tibial size combinations and TKA design on kinematics.

Authors:  Ingrid Dupraz; Christoph Thorwächter; Thomas M Grupp; Florian Hammerschmid; Matthias Woiczinski; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller; Arnd Steinbrück
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Preservation of kinematics with posterior cruciate-, bicruciate- and patient-specific bicruciate-retaining prostheses in total knee arthroplasty by using computational simulation with normal knee model.

Authors:  Y-G Koh; J Son; S-K Kwon; H-J Kim; O-R Kwon; K-T Kang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Kinematics and kinetics comparison of ultra-congruent versus medial-pivot designs for total knee arthroplasty by multibody analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Putame; Mara Terzini; Fabrizio Rivera; Maeruan Kebbach; Rainer Bader; Cristina Bignardi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prediction of wear performance in femoral and tibial conformity in patient-specific cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Kyoung-Mi Park; Hwa-Yong Lee; Joon-Hee Park; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.