Literature DB >> 19594460

One-year outcomes following coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome.

Judd E Hollander1, Anna Marie Chang, Frances S Shofer, Mark J Collin, Kristy M Walsh, Christine M McCusker, William G Baxt, Harold I Litt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Coronary computerized tomographic angiography (CTA) has high correlation with cardiac catheterization and has been shown to be safe and cost-effective when used for rapid evaluation of low-risk chest pain patients from the emergency department (ED). The long-term outcome of patients discharged from the ED with negative coronary CTA has not been well studied.
METHODS: The authors prospectively evaluated consecutive low- to intermediate-risk patients who received coronary CTA in the ED for evaluation of a potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients with cocaine use, known cancer, and significant comorbidity reducing life expectancy and those found to have significant disease (stenosis > or = 50% or ejection fraction < 30%) were excluded. Demographics, medical and cardiac history, labs, and electrocardiogram (ECG) results were collected. Patients were followed by telephone contact and record review for 1 year. The main outcome was 1-year cardiovascular death or nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
RESULTS: Of 588 patients who received coronary CTA in the ED, 481 met study criteria. They had a mean (+/-SD) age of 46.1 (+/-8.8) years, 63% were black or African American, and 60% were female. There were 53 patients (11%) rehospitalized and 51 patients (11%) who received further diagnostic testing (stress or catheterization) over the subsequent year. There was one death (0.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01% to 1.15%) with unclear etiology, no AMI (0%; 95% CI = 0 to 0.76%), and no revascularization procedures (0%; 95% CI = 0 to 0.76%) during this time period.
CONCLUSIONS: Low- to intermediate-risk patients with a Thrombosis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score of 0 to 2 who present to the ED with potential ACS and have a negative coronary CTA have a very low likelihood of cardiovascular events over the ensuing year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19594460     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00459.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  28 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking cocaine-associated chest pain and acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jonathan B Finkel; Gregary D Marhefka
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Prognostic utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Yuka Otaki; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-12

3.  Cost and resource utilization associated with use of computed tomography to evaluate chest pain in the emergency department: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Alexander Goehler; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Fabian Bamberg; Christopher L Schlett; Quynh A Truong; John Nichols; Khurram Nasir; Ian S Rogers; Scott G Gazelle; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 4.  Cardiac CT in the emergency department: convincing evidence, but cautious implementation.

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Gudrun Feuchtner; Carol Mascioli; Jonathon Fialkow; Paul Andrulonis; Tomas Villanueva; Constantino S Pena; Warren R Janowitz; Barry T Katzen; Jack A Ziffer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Cardiac computed tomography in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Koen Nieman; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Design of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography: a multicenter randomized comparative effectiveness trial of cardiac computed tomography versus alternative triage strategies in patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong; Jerome L Fleg; Alexander Goehler; Scott Gazelle; Stephen Wiviott; Hang Lee; James E Udelson; David Schoenfeld
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department: 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial.

Authors:  Christopher L Schlett; Dahlia Banerji; Emily Siegel; Fabian Bamberg; Sam J Lehman; Maros Ferencik; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05

8.  Efficacy of multi-detector coronary computed tomography angiography in comparison with exercise electrocardiogram in the triage of patients of low risk acute chest pain.

Authors:  M Nagori; V S Narain; R K Saran; S K Dwivedi; R Sethi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-07-03

9.  Efficiency and safety of coronary CT angiography compared to standard care in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain: a Canadian study.

Authors:  Elena Peña; Fraser Rubens; Ian Stiell; Rebecca Peterson; Joao Inacio; Carole Dennie
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-05-24

10.  Relationship between body mass index and prognosis of patients presenting with potential acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jon Dooley; Anna Marie Chang; Rama A Salhi; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.