Literature DB >> 19594168

Thermodynamic characterization of the exchange of detergents and amphipols at the surfaces of integral membrane proteins.

C Tribet1, C Diab, T Dahmane, M Zoonens, J-L Popot, F M Winnik.   

Abstract

The aggregation of integral membrane proteins (IMPs) in aqueous media is a significant concern for mechanistic investigations and pharmaceutical applications of this important class of proteins. Complexation of IMPs with amphiphiles, either detergents or short amphiphilic polymers known as amphipols (APols), renders IMPs water-soluble. It is common knowledge that IMP-detergent complexes are labile, while IMP-APol complexes are exceptionally stable and do not dissociate even under conditions of extreme dilution. To understand the thermodynamic origin of this difference in stability and to guide the design of new APols, we have studied by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) the heat exchanges during two reciprocal processes, the "trapping" of detergent-solubilized IMPs in APols and the "stripping" of IMP-APol complexes by detergents, using two IMPs (the transmembrane domain of porin OmpA from Escherichia coli and bacteriorhodopsin from Halobium salinarium), two APols [an anionic polymer derived from acrylic acid (A8-35) and a cationic phosphorylcholine-based polymer (C22-43)], and two neutral detergents [n-octyl thioglucoside (OTG) and n-octyltetraethylene glycol (C(8)E(4))]. In the presence of detergent, free APols and IMP-APol complexes form mixed particles, APol-detergent and IMP-APol-detergent, respectively, according to the regular mixing model. Diluting IMP-APol-detergent complexes below the critical micellar concentration (CMC) of the detergent triggers the dispersion of detergent molecules as monomers, a process characterized by an enthalpy of demicellization. The enthalpy of APol <--> detergent exchange on the hydrophobic surface of IMPs is negligibly small, an indication of the similarity of the molecular interactions of IMPs with the two types of amphiphiles. The enhanced stability against dilution of IMP-APol complexes, compared to IMP-detergent ones, originates from the difference in entropy gain achieved upon release in water of a few APol molecules (in the case of IMP-APol complexes) or several hundred detergent molecules (in the case of IMP-detergent complexes). The data account both for the stability of IMP-APols complexes in the absence of detergent and for the ease with which detergents displace APols from the surface of proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19594168     DOI: 10.1021/la9018772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langmuir        ISSN: 0743-7463            Impact factor:   3.882


  27 in total

1.  Synthesis, characterization and applications of a perdeuterated amphipol.

Authors:  Fabrice Giusti; Jutta Rieger; Laurent J Catoire; Shuo Qian; Antonio N Calabrese; Thomas G Watkinson; Marina Casiraghi; Sheena E Radford; Alison E Ashcroft; Jean-Luc Popot
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  The use of amphipols for NMR structural characterization of 7-TM proteins.

Authors:  Shantha Elter; Thomas Raschle; Sabine Arens; Aldino Viegas; Vladimir Gelev; Manuel Etzkorn; Gerhard Wagner
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Isolation of Escherichia coli mannitol permease, EIImtl, trapped in amphipol A8-35 and fluorescein-labeled A8-35.

Authors:  Milena Opačić; Fabrice Giusti; Jean-Luc Popot; Jaap Broos
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Single-particle cryo-EM of the ryanodine receptor channel in an aqueous environment.

Authors:  Mariah R Baker; Guizhen Fan; Irina I Serysheva
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2015

5.  Amphipol-mediated screening of molecular orthoses specific for membrane protein targets.

Authors:  Yann Ferrandez; Manuela Dezi; Mickael Bosco; Agathe Urvoas; Marie Valerio-Lepiniec; Christel Le Bon; Fabrice Giusti; Isabelle Broutin; Grégory Durand; Ange Polidori; Jean-Luc Popot; Martin Picard; Philippe Minard
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Solution behavior and crystallization of cytochrome bc₁ in the presence of amphipols.

Authors:  Delphine Charvolin; Martin Picard; Li-Shar Huang; Edward A Berry; Jean-Luc Popot
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Nanoparticle surface-enhanced Raman scattering of bacteriorhodopsin stabilized by amphipol A8-35.

Authors:  V Polovinkin; T Balandin; O Volkov; E Round; V Borshchevskiy; P Utrobin; D von Stetten; A Royant; D Willbold; G Arzumanyan; V Chupin; J-L Popot; V Gordeliy
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  High-resolution structure of a membrane protein transferred from amphipol to a lipidic mesophase.

Authors:  V Polovinkin; I Gushchin; M Sintsov; E Round; T Balandin; P Chervakov; V Shevchenko; P Utrobin; A Popov; V Borshchevskiy; A Mishin; A Kuklin; D Willbold; V Chupin; J-L Popot; V Gordeliy
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 1.843

9.  Increased immunoaccessibility of MOMP epitopes in a vaccine formulated with amphipols may account for the very robust protection elicited against a vaginal challenge with Chlamydia muridarum.

Authors:  Delia F Tifrea; Sukumar Pal; Jean-Luc Popot; Melanie J Cocco; Luis M de la Maza
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 10.  Amphipols for each season.

Authors:  Manuela Zoonens; Jean-Luc Popot
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.