Literature DB >> 19593178

Monoamine oxidase a and catechol-o-methyltransferase functional polymorphisms and the placebo response in major depressive disorder.

Andrew F Leuchter1, James T McCracken, Aimee M Hunter, Ian A Cook, Jonathan E Alpert.   

Abstract

The placebo response shows pronounced interindividual variability. Placebos are postulated to act through central reward pathways that are modulated by monoamines. Because monoaminergic signaling is under strong genetic control, we hypothesized that common functional polymorphisms modulating monoaminergic tone would be related to degree of improvement during placebo treatment of subjects with major depressive disorder. We examined polymorphisms in genes encoding the catabolic enzymes catechol-O-methyltransferase and monoamine oxidase A. Subjects with monoamine oxidase A G/T polymorphisms (rs6323) coding for the highest activity form of the enzyme (G or G/G) had a significantly lower magnitude of placebo response than those with other genotypes. Subjects with ValMet catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphisms coding for a lower-activity form of the enzyme (2 Met alleles) showed a statistical trend toward a lower magnitude of placebo response. These findings support the hypothesis that genetic polymorphisms modulating monoaminergic tone are related to degree of placebo responsiveness in major depressive disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19593178     DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181ac4aaf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  37 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response.

Authors:  Stefano Porcelli; Antonio Drago; Chiara Fabbri; Sara Gibiino; Raffaella Calati; Alessandro Serretti
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  The placebo effect: From concepts to genes.

Authors:  B Colagiuri; L A Schenk; M D Kessler; S G Dorsey; L Colloca
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Mechanisms and clinical implications of the placebo effect: is there a potential for the elderly? A mini-review.

Authors:  Ulrike Bingel; Luana Colloca; Lene Vase
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 4.  How placebo responses are formed: a learning perspective.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Role of placebo effects in pain and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Annabelle M Belcher; Sergi Ferré; Pedro E Martinez; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 6.  The placebo response in medicine: minimize, maximize or personalize?

Authors:  Paul Enck; Ulrike Bingel; Manfred Schedlowski; Winfried Rief
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  How placebos change the patient's brain.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Elisa Carlino; Antonella Pollo
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 8.  Understanding placebo and nocebo responses for pain management.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-06

9.  Genetic biomarkers of placebo response: what could it mean for future trial design?

Authors:  Kathryn T Hall; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2013-04-01

10.  Placebo analgesia and reward processing: integrating genetics, personality, and intrinsic brain activity.

Authors:  Rongjun Yu; Randy L Gollub; Mark Vangel; Ted Kaptchuk; Jordan W Smoller; Jian Kong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.