Literature DB >> 1959291

Clinical results of total knee revision using the Total Condylar III prosthesis.

A G Rosenberg1, J J Verner, J O Galante.   

Abstract

The clinical results after knee revision arthroplasty using the Total Condylar III (TC III) prosthesis were reviewed in 36 patients (36 knees). Patients were assessed by physical examination, completion of a 100-point, modified Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating form, and roentgenographic evaluation. There were 27 women and nine men, with a mean age of 68 years. Mean follow-up period was 45 months (range, 24-84 months). Reason for revision was sepsis in 15 patients and loosening or instability in 21 patients. Twenty were Category C patients with multiple joint involvement or significant medical infirmity. Preoperative knee scores ranged from 11-72 points (mean, 36 points). Postoperative scores ranged from 40-99 points (mean, 77 points). Clinical results were graded according to Insall. Eleven patients were graded excellent, 14 patients good, six fair, four poor, and there was one failure. Pain scores improved from a mean preoperative score of 16 points to 43 points postoperatively (50 points possible). However, function scores improved less dramatically. Range of motion based on maximum flexion averaged 98 degrees postoperatively. Varus tibial placement occurred in 50% (range, 1 degree-9 degrees). Slight flexion of the femur was seen in 73%. Lucent lines occurred in 60%, with 16% of the patients showing progressive tibial lucencies. The TC III prosthesis for revision arthroplasty is effective for salvaging unstable knees. Since the natural history of tibial radiolucency is not clear, less-constrained devices should probably be used when possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1959291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  5 in total

1.  Increased constraint of rotating hinge knee prosthesis is associated with poorer clinical outcomes as compared to constrained condylar knee prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason Beng Teck Lim; Hee Nee Pang; Keng Jin Darren Tay; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-16

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with varus-valgus constrained prosthesis versus posterior stabilized prosthesis.

Authors:  Joon Kyu Lee; Sahnghoon Lee; Dongwook Kim; Sang Min Lee; Jak Jang; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Sun-Chul Hwang; Jae-Yeon Kong; Dae-Cheol Nam; Dong-Hee Kim; Hyung-Bin Park; Soon-Taek Jeong; Se-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04

4.  Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Sanz-Ruiz; Manuel Villanueva-Martínez; Jose Antonio Matas-Diez; Javier Vaquero-Martín
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY USING THE MODERN CONSTRAINED CONDYLAR KNEE PROSTHESIS.

Authors:  Naoki Nakano; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Kazunari Ishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.