Literature DB >> 19592085

Radiopaque iodinated copolymeric nanoparticles for X-ray imaging applications.

Hagit Aviv1, Sonke Bartling, Fabian Kieslling, Shlomo Margel.   

Abstract

Recently we described iodinated homopolymeric radiopaque nanoparticles of 28.9+/-6.3 nm dry diameter synthesized by emulsion polymerization of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl(2,3,5-triiodobenzoate) (MAOETIB). The nanoparticle aqueous dispersion, however, was not stable and tended to agglomerate, particularly at weight concentration of dispersed nanoparticles above approximately 0.3%. The agglomeration rate increases as the concentration of nanoparticles in aqueous phase rises and prevents the potential in vivo use as contrast agent for medical X-ray imaging. Here we describe efforts to overcome this limitation by synthesis of iodinated copolymeric nanoparticles of 25.5+/-4.2 nm dry diameter, by emulsion copolymerization of the monomer, MAOETIB, with a low concentration of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA). The surface of resulting copolymeric nanoparticles is far more hydrophilic than that of polyMAOETIB (PMAOETIB) nanoparticles. Therefore, P(MAOETIB-GMA) nanoparticles are significantly more stable against agglomeration in aqueous continuous phase. After intravenous injection of P(MAOETIB-GMA) nanoparticles in rats and mice (including those with a liver cancer model) CT-imaging revealed a significant enhanced visibility of the blood pool for 30 min after injection. Later, lymph nodes, liver and spleen strongly enhanced due to nanoparticle uptake by the reticuloendothelial system. This favorably enabled the differentiation of cancerous from healthy liver tissue and suggests our particles for tumor imaging in liver and lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19592085     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  18 in total

Review 1.  Molecular body imaging: MR imaging, CT, and US. part I. principles.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Preclinical lymphatic imaging.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Gang Niu; Guangming Lu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Biodegradable iodinated polydisulfides as contrast agents for CT angiography.

Authors:  Erlei Jin; Zheng-Rong Lu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Advanced targeted nanomedicine.

Authors:  Mohan C Pereira; Mohan C M Arachchige; Yana K Reshetnyak; Oleg A Andreev
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 5.  X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents.

Authors:  Hrvoje Lusic; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Nanobarcoding: detecting nanoparticles in biological samples using in situ polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Trisha Eustaquio; James F Leary
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-11-02

7.  Synthesis of nanoparticle CT contrast agents: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Sung June Kim; Wenlong Xu; Md Wasi Ahmad; Jong Su Baeck; Yongmin Chang; Ji Eun Bae; Kwon Seok Chae; Tae Jeong Kim; Ji Ae Park; Gang Ho Lee
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 8.090

Review 8.  In vivo small animal micro-CT using nanoparticle contrast agents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Ashton; Jennifer L West; Cristian T Badea
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 9.  Nanoparticles for multimodal in vivo imaging in nanomedicine.

Authors:  Jaehong Key; James F Leary
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-01-29

Review 10.  Nanoparticles for imaging: top or flop?

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Marianne E Mertens; Jan Grimm; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.