| Literature DB >> 19590714 |
Jung-Hee Hong1, Youn-Soo Cha, Soon-Jae Rhee.
Abstract
This study examined the effect of cellcultured Acanthopanax senticosus (Entities:
Keywords: C57BL/6J mice; Cellcultured Acanthopanax senticosus extract; antioxidative defense system; membrane fluidity; oxidative stress
Year: 2009 PMID: 19590714 PMCID: PMC2704242 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.08-263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Effects of the Cellcultured Acanthopanax Senticosus extract on body weight gains, food intake, food efficiency ratio and blood glucose in C57BL/6J mice
| Normal | Diabetic | ANOVA1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-C | N-CASM | DM-C | DM-CASM | D | A | D × A | |
| Initial body weight (g) | 19.52 ± 7.13 | 19.08 ± 6.91 | 19.77 ± 9.27 | 20.23 ± 8.61 | NS | NS | NS |
| Weight gain (g/12 weeks) | 5.82 ± 0.78c | 5.04 ± 0.36c | 16.69 ± 4.27a | 12.49 ± 3.45b | 0.0001 | 0.0185 | NS |
| Food intake (g/12 weeks) | 198.24 ± 0.06 | 223.44 ± 0.27 | 199.08 ± 0.17 | 194.04 ± 0.07 | NS | NS | NS |
| FER2 | 0.029 ± 0.007c | 0.023 ± 0.0024d | 0.086 ± 0.0065a | 0.065 ± 0.0019b | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0062 |
| Liver weight (g) | 0.85 ± 0.08b | 0.88 ± 0.14b | 1.54 ± 0.47 a | 0.97 ± 0.11b | 0.0001 | 0.0163 | NS |
| Blood glucose (mg/dl) | 95.98 ± 7.36c | 93.49 ± 9.92c | 215.56 ± 16.72a | 176.92 ± 26.39b | 0.0001 | 0.0007 | 1 |
The values represent the mean ± SD of 10 mice per group. Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences (p<0.05) among groups by Tukey’s test.
1The degree of significance resulting from the two-way ANOVA is shown with effects of diet (D), administration A. senticosus (A), and the interaction of diet and administration of A. senticosus (D × A) being expressed as the numerical value or as not significant (NS) when p<0.05.
2Food efficiency ratio (FER) was calculated as weight gain weight gain (g/12 weeks)/food intake (g/12 weeks).
Effects of the Cellcultured Acanthopanax Senticosus extract on SOD, GSHpx, and CAT activity in the liver of type 2 diabetes mouse
| SOD (unit/mg protein/min) | GSHpx (nmol NADPH/mg protein/min) | CAT (nmol/mg protein/min) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | N-C | 0.48 ± 0.02a | 170.05 ± 4.27a | 69.00 ± 5.30a |
| N-CASM | 0.49 ± 0.03a | 179.97 ± 2.20a | 75.05 ± 3.89a | |
| Diabetic | DM-C | 0.40 ± 0.01c | 150.80 ± 5.65b | 49.90 ± 5.48b |
| DM-CASM | 0.45 ± 0.03b | 168.74 ± 1.04a | 67.90 ± 5.48a |
The values represent the mean ± SD of 10 mice per group. Values with different superscript letters are significantly different at p<0.05 as shown by Tukey’s test.
Fig. 1Effects of the Cellcultured Acanthopanax Senticosus extract on mitochondria (A) and microsome (B) superoxide radicals in the liver of type 2 diabetes mouse. The values represent the mean ± SD of 10 mice per group. Values with different superscript letters are significantly different at p<0.05 as shown by Tukey’s test.
Fig. 2Effects of the Cellcultured Acanthopanax Senticosus extract on mitochondria (A) and cytosol (B) hydrogen peroxixe (H2O2) in the liver of type 2 diabetes mouse. The values represent the mean ± SD of 10 mice per group. Values with different superscript letters are significantly different at p<0.05 as shown by Tukey’s test.
Effects of the Cellcultured Acanthopanax Senticosus extract on TBARS and lipofuscin in the liver of type 2 diabetes mouse
| TBARS (MDA nmol/mg protein) | Lipofuscin (µg/mg protein) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | N-C | 11.80 ± 0.82c | 11.80 ± 0.82c |
| N-CASM | 10.97 ± 1.61c | 10.97 ± 1.61c | |
| Diabetic | DM-C | 17.62 ± 1.54a | 17.62 ± 1.54a |
| DM-CASM | 14.72 ± 0.79b | 14.72 ± 0.79b |
The values represent the mean ± SD of 10 mice per group. Values with different superscript letters are significantly different at p<0.05 as shown by Tukey’s test.
Fig. 3Effects of the Cellcultured Acanthopanax Senticosus extract on mitochondria (A) and microsome (B) membrane fluidity in the liver of type 2 diabetes mouse. The values represent the mean ± SD of 10 mice per group. Values with different superscript letters are significantly different at p<0.05 as shown by Tukey’s test.