Literature DB >> 19590628

Poorer survival in patients whose explanted hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeds Milan or UCSF Criteria. An analysis of liver transplantation in HCC in Australia and New Zealand.

John W C Chen1, Lilian Kow, Deborah J Verran, John L McCall, Stephen Munn, Glenda A Balderson, Jonathan W Fawcett, Paul J Gow, Robert M Jones, Gary P Jeffrey, Anthony K House, Simone I Strasser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Milan and University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Criteria have been used for selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation (LTx). The aims of this study were to analyse the results of LTx for HCC in Australia and New Zealand with emphasis on the effects of discordance between pre-LTx radiological and post-LTx pathological staging.
METHODS: A total of 186 LTx for HCC carried out between July 1985 and August 2003 were included. Patients were categorized according to the Milan and UCSF Criteria.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6.55 years (range 2.96-20.93 years). Pre-LTx factors associated with better survival include tumour size < or = 5 cm, number of tumours < or = 3, staging within Milan and UCSF Criteria and more recent transplantation (1996-2003). In all, 14 patients had a pre-LTx stage outside the Milan but within the UCSF Criteria. One- and 5-year patient survival rates were, respectively, 88% and 74% within the Milan Criteria, and 87% and 73% within the UCSF Criteria. Vascular invasion, capsular invasion, lymph node invasion and pathological stage outside UCSF Criteria were associated with poor outcome. Of patients within the Milan and UCSF Criteria pre-LTx, 24% and 18%, respectively, were outside the same criteria post-LTx. These patients had poorer survival rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the UCSF Criteria in this cohort increased the number of patients eligible for LTx without compromising 5-year survival rates. Patients whose explant tumours were outside the Milan or UCSF Criteria had poorer outcomes compared with those whose explants remained within these criteria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Milan Criteria; UCSF Criteria; hepatectomy; liver cancer

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590628      PMCID: PMC2697869          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00022.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical and pathological staging and long-term results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in a single transplant center.

Authors:  U Baccarani; G L Adani; C Avellini; D Lorenzin; G Currò; A Beltrami; A Pasqualucci; V Bresadola; A Risaliti; P L Viale; C A Beltrami; F Bresadola
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond tumor size and number?

Authors:  Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Liver transplantation: the preferred treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma in the setting of cirrhosis?

Authors:  Myron Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Accuracy of staging as a predictor for recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shimul A Shah; Jensen C C Tan; Ian D McGilvray; Mark S Cattral; Sean P Cleary; Gary A Levy; Paul D Greig; David R Grant
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: is clinical tumor classification before transplantation realistic?

Authors:  Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Massimo Malagó; Ernesto Molmenti; Andreas Paul; Silvio Nadalin; Eirini Brokalaki; Hilmar Kühl; Olaf Dirsch; Hauke Lang; Christoph E Broelsch
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  Transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: The Milan criteria and beyond.

Authors:  Richard B Freeman
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Response to transarterial chemoembolization as a biological selection criterion for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gerd Otto; Sascha Herber; Michael Heise; Ansgar W Lohse; Christian Mönch; Fernando Bittinger; Maria Hoppe-Lotichius; Marcus Schuchmann; Anja Victor; Michael Pitton
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Impact of UCSF criteria according to pre- and post-OLT tumor features: analysis of 479 patients listed for HCC with a short waiting time.

Authors:  Thomas Decaens; Françoise Roudot-Thoraval; Solange Hadni-Bresson; Carole Meyer; Jean Gugenheim; Francois Durand; Pierre-Henri Bernard; Olivier Boillot; Laurent Sulpice; Yvon Calmus; Jean Hardwigsen; Christian Ducerf; Georges-Philippe Pageaux; Sebastien Dharancy; Olivier Chazouilleres; Daniel Cherqui; Christophe Duvoux
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: Implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Keith A Delman; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; David M Nagorney; Irene Oi-Lin Ng; Iwao Ikai; Yoshio Yamaoka; Jacques Belghiti; Gregory Y Lauwers; Ronnie T Poon; Eddie K Abdalla
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  A prospective study on downstaging of hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation.

Authors:  Francis Y Yao; Ryutaro Hirose; Jeanne M LaBerge; Timothy J Davern; Nathan M Bass; Robert K Kerlan; Raphael Merriman; Sandy Feng; Chris E Freise; Nancy L Ascher; John P Roberts
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tony Cy Pang; Vincent Wt Lam
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-02-27

Review 2.  Strategies to improve outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving a liver transplantation.

Authors:  Marta Guerrero-Misas; Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez; Manuel De la Mata
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-08

3.  HCC patients suffer less from geographic differences in organ availability.

Authors:  C Schuetz; N Dong; E Smoot; N Elias; D A Schoenfeld; J F Markmann; H Yeh
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 4.  From minimal to maximal surgery in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma: A review.

Authors:  Marcos Vinicius Perini; Graham Starkey; Michael A Fink; Ramesh Bhandari; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; Robert Jones; Christopher Christophi
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-27

5.  Expansion of Liver Transplantation Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Milan to UCSF in Australia and New Zealand and Justification for Metroticket 2.0.

Authors:  Savio G Barreto; Simone I Strasser; Geoffrey W McCaughan; Michael A Fink; Robert Jones; John McCall; Stephen Munn; Graeme A Macdonald; Peter Hodgkinson; Gary P Jeffrey; Bryon Jaques; Michael Crawford; Mark E Brooke-Smith; John W Chen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Comparison between Milan and UCSF criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jorge Henrique Bento de Sousa; Igor Lepski Calil; Francisco Tustumi; Douglas da Cunha Khalil; Guilherme Eduardo Gonçalves Felga; Rafael Antonio de Arruda Pecora; Marcio Dias de Almeida
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-01-05

7.  Accuracy of Pretransplant Imaging Diagnostic for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective German Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Uta Herden; Wenzel Schoening; Johann Pratschke; Steffen Manekeller; Andreas Paul; Richard Linke; Thomas Lorf; Frank Lehner; Felix Braun; Dirk L Stippel; Robert Sucher; Hartmut Schmidt; Christian P Strassburg; Markus Guba; Marieke van Rosmalen; Xavier Rogiers; Undine Samuel; Gerhard MSc Schön; Bjoern Nashan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-05

8.  Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vladimir J Lozanovski; Ali Ramouz; Ehsan Aminizadeh; Sadeq Ali-Hasan Al-Saegh; Elias Khajeh; Heike Probst; Susanne Picardi; Christian Rupp; De-Hua Chang; Pascal Probst; Arianeb Mehrabi
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-01-06

9.  Evaluation of eligibility criteria in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma by α-SMA-positive cancer-associated fibroblasts.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takamura; Shinichi Nakanuma; Hironori Hayashi; Hidehiro Tajima; Kaheita Kakinoki; Seisyo Sakai; Isamu Makino; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Tomoharu Miyashita; Koichi Okamoto; Keishi Nakamura; Katunobu Oyama; Masashi Inokuchi; Itasu Ninomiya; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Ichiro Ohnishi; Masato Kayahara; Takashi Tani; Kuniaki Arai; Taro Yamashita; Tatsuya Yamashita; Hoshiko Kitamura; Hiroko Ikeda; Shuichi Kaneko; Yasuni Nakanuma; Osamu Matsui; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Liver transplantation for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: An adaptive approach.

Authors:  Marco Biolato; Giuseppe Marrone; Luca Miele; Antonio Gasbarrini; Antonio Grieco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.