Literature DB >> 19590058

Second primary breast cancer occurrence according to hormone receptor status.

Allison W Kurian1, Laura A McClure, Esther M John, Pamela L Horn-Ross, James M Ford, Christina A Clarke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contralateral second primary breast cancers occur in 4% of female breast cancer survivors. Little is known about differences in risk for second primary breast cancers related to the estrogen and progesterone receptor (hormone receptor [HR]) status of the first tumor.
METHODS: We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for contralateral primary breast cancers among 4927 women diagnosed with a first breast cancer between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2004, using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.
RESULTS: For women whose first breast tumors were HR positive, risk of contralateral primary breast cancer was elevated, compared with the general population, adjusted for age, race, and calendar year (SIR = 2.22, 95% CI = 2.15 to 2.29, absolute risk [AR] = 13 cases per 10 000 person-years [PY]), and was not related to the HR status of the second tumor. For women whose first breast tumors were HR negative, the risk of a contralateral primary tumor was statistically significantly higher than that for women whose first tumors were HR positive (SIR = 3.57, 95% CI = 3.38 to 3.78, AR = 18 per 10 000 PY), and it was associated with a much greater likelihood of an HR-negative second tumor (SIR for HR-positive second tumors = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.77 to 2.13, AR = 20 per 10 000 PY; SIR for HR-negative second tumors = 9.81, 95% CI = 9.00 to 10.7, AR = 24 per 10 000 PY). Women who were initially diagnosed with HR-negative tumors when younger than 30 years had greatly elevated risk of HR-negative contralateral tumors, compared with the general population (SIR = 169, 95% CI = 106 to 256, AR = 77 per 10 000 PY). Incidence rates for any contralateral primary cancer following an HR-negative or HR-positive tumor were higher in non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and Asians or Pacific Islanders than in non-Hispanic whites.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk for contralateral second primary breast cancers varies substantially by HR status of the first tumor, age, and race and/or ethnicity. Women with HR-negative first tumors have nearly a 10-fold elevated risk of developing HR-negative second tumors, compared with the general population. These findings warrant intensive surveillance for second breast cancers in women with HR-negative tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19590058      PMCID: PMC2720990          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  47 in total

1.  Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Bruce G Haffty; Qifeng Yang; Michael Reiss; Thomas Kearney; Susan A Higgins; Joanne Weidhaas; Lyndsay Harris; Willam Hait; Deborah Toppmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, oral contraceptive use, and breast cancer before age 50.

Authors:  Robert W Haile; Duncan C Thomas; Valerie McGuire; Anna Felberg; Esther M John; Roger L Milne; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; A Joan Levine; Mary M Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ruby T Senie; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Andrew K Godwin; Melissa Southey; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; Lesley Andrews; Katherine Tucker; Alexander Miron; Carmel Apicella; Andrea Tesoriero; Anita Bane; Malcolm C Pike; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Fan; Daniel S Oh; Lodewyk Wessels; Britta Weigelt; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Andrew B Nobel; Laura J van't Veer; Charles M Perou
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Harvey A Risch; John R McLaughlin; David E C Cole; Barry Rosen; Linda Bradley; Isabel Fan; James Tang; Song Li; Shiyu Zhang; Patricia A Shaw; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Hormone receptor status of a contralateral breast cancer is independent of the receptor status of the first primary in patients not receiving adjuvant tamoxifen.

Authors:  G Arpino; H L Weiss; G M Clark; S G Hilsenbeck; C K Osborne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Familial risks in second primary breast cancer based on a family cancer database.

Authors:  K Hemminki; P Vaittinen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Dissemination of adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States using estrogen receptor information: 1975-1999.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; Eric J Feuer; Linda C Harlan; Jeffrey Abrams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2006

9.  A comparison of bilateral breast cancers in BRCA carriers.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Mark Robson; Barbara Pasini; Siranoush Manoukian; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Henry T Lynch; Jane McLennan; William D Foulkes; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Parviz Ghadirian; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Claudine Isaacs; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Pal Møller; Susan L Neuhausen; Kelly Metcalfe; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Race and triple negative threats to breast cancer survival: a population-based study in Atlanta, GA.

Authors:  Mary Jo Lund; Katrina F Trivers; Peggy L Porter; Ralph J Coates; Brian Leyland-Jones; Otis W Brawley; Elaine W Flagg; Ruth M O'Regan; Sheryl G A Gabram; J William Eley
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  41 in total

1.  Mortality After Breast Cancer Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Chaya S Moskowitz; Joanne F Chou; Joseph P Neglia; Ann H Partridge; Rebecca M Howell; Lisa R Diller; Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Dana Barnea; Lindsay M Morton; Lucie M Turcotte; Michael A Arnold; Wendy M Leisenring; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger; Tara O Henderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Nipple Aspirate Fluid Hormone Concentrations and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Robert T Chatterton; Richard E Heinz; Angela J Fought; David Ivancic; Claire Shappell; Subhashini Allu; Susan Gapstur; Denise M Scholtens; Peter H Gann; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Incidence of metachronous contralateral breast cancer in the Canton of Zurich: a population-based study of the cancer registry.

Authors:  Julia Prater; Fabio Valeri; Dimitri Korol; Sabine Rohrmann; Silvia Dehler
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Dose-dependent effect of mammographic breast density on the risk of contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Marzana Chowdhury; David Euhus; Maureen O'Donnell; Tracy Onega; Pankaj K Choudhary; Swati Biswas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contralateral Breast Cancer Occurrence Among Older Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Jessica B Long; Brigid K Killelea; Suzanne B Evans; Kenneth B Roberts; Andrea Silber; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is influenced by preoperative MRI recommendations.

Authors:  Chang Xia; Mary C Schroeder; Ronald J Weigel; Sonia L Sugg; Alexandra Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-neu expression in first primary breast cancers and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Babette Siebold Saltzman; Kathleen E Malone; Jean A McDougall; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  History, biology, and health inequities: emergent embodied phenotypes and the illustrative case of the breast cancer estrogen receptor.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  Bilateral breast cancers.

Authors:  Steven A Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.