BACKGROUND: Contralateral second primary breast cancers occur in 4% of female breast cancer survivors. Little is known about differences in risk for second primary breast cancers related to the estrogen and progesterone receptor (hormone receptor [HR]) status of the first tumor. METHODS: We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for contralateral primary breast cancers among 4927 women diagnosed with a first breast cancer between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2004, using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. RESULTS: For women whose first breast tumors were HR positive, risk of contralateral primary breast cancer was elevated, compared with the general population, adjusted for age, race, and calendar year (SIR = 2.22, 95% CI = 2.15 to 2.29, absolute risk [AR] = 13 cases per 10 000 person-years [PY]), and was not related to the HR status of the second tumor. For women whose first breast tumors were HR negative, the risk of a contralateral primary tumor was statistically significantly higher than that for women whose first tumors were HR positive (SIR = 3.57, 95% CI = 3.38 to 3.78, AR = 18 per 10 000 PY), and it was associated with a much greater likelihood of an HR-negative second tumor (SIR for HR-positive second tumors = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.77 to 2.13, AR = 20 per 10 000 PY; SIR for HR-negative second tumors = 9.81, 95% CI = 9.00 to 10.7, AR = 24 per 10 000 PY). Women who were initially diagnosed with HR-negative tumors when younger than 30 years had greatly elevated risk of HR-negative contralateral tumors, compared with the general population (SIR = 169, 95% CI = 106 to 256, AR = 77 per 10 000 PY). Incidence rates for any contralateral primary cancer following an HR-negative or HR-positive tumor were higher in non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and Asians or Pacific Islanders than in non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSIONS: Risk for contralateral second primary breast cancers varies substantially by HR status of the first tumor, age, and race and/or ethnicity. Women with HR-negative first tumors have nearly a 10-fold elevated risk of developing HR-negative second tumors, compared with the general population. These findings warrant intensive surveillance for second breast cancers in women with HR-negative tumors.
BACKGROUND: Contralateral second primary breast cancers occur in 4% of female breast cancer survivors. Little is known about differences in risk for second primary breast cancers related to the estrogen and progesterone receptor (hormone receptor [HR]) status of the first tumor. METHODS: We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for contralateral primary breast cancers among 4927 women diagnosed with a first breast cancer between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2004, using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. RESULTS: For women whose first breast tumors were HR positive, risk of contralateral primary breast cancer was elevated, compared with the general population, adjusted for age, race, and calendar year (SIR = 2.22, 95% CI = 2.15 to 2.29, absolute risk [AR] = 13 cases per 10 000 person-years [PY]), and was not related to the HR status of the second tumor. For women whose first breast tumors were HR negative, the risk of a contralateral primary tumor was statistically significantly higher than that for women whose first tumors were HR positive (SIR = 3.57, 95% CI = 3.38 to 3.78, AR = 18 per 10 000 PY), and it was associated with a much greater likelihood of an HR-negative second tumor (SIR for HR-positive second tumors = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.77 to 2.13, AR = 20 per 10 000 PY; SIR for HR-negative second tumors = 9.81, 95% CI = 9.00 to 10.7, AR = 24 per 10 000 PY). Women who were initially diagnosed with HR-negative tumors when younger than 30 years had greatly elevated risk of HR-negative contralateral tumors, compared with the general population (SIR = 169, 95% CI = 106 to 256, AR = 77 per 10 000 PY). Incidence rates for any contralateral primary cancer following an HR-negative or HR-positive tumor were higher in non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and Asians or Pacific Islanders than in non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSIONS: Risk for contralateral second primary breast cancers varies substantially by HR status of the first tumor, age, and race and/or ethnicity. Women with HR-negative first tumors have nearly a 10-fold elevated risk of developing HR-negative second tumors, compared with the general population. These findings warrant intensive surveillance for second breast cancers in women with HR-negative tumors.
Authors: Bruce G Haffty; Qifeng Yang; Michael Reiss; Thomas Kearney; Susan A Higgins; Joanne Weidhaas; Lyndsay Harris; Willam Hait; Deborah Toppmeyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert W Haile; Duncan C Thomas; Valerie McGuire; Anna Felberg; Esther M John; Roger L Milne; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; A Joan Levine; Mary M Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ruby T Senie; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Andrew K Godwin; Melissa Southey; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; Lesley Andrews; Katherine Tucker; Alexander Miron; Carmel Apicella; Andrea Tesoriero; Anita Bane; Malcolm C Pike; Alice S Whittemore Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Cheng Fan; Daniel S Oh; Lodewyk Wessels; Britta Weigelt; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Andrew B Nobel; Laura J van't Veer; Charles M Perou Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Harvey A Risch; John R McLaughlin; David E C Cole; Barry Rosen; Linda Bradley; Isabel Fan; James Tang; Song Li; Shiyu Zhang; Patricia A Shaw; Steven A Narod Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jeffrey N Weitzel; Mark Robson; Barbara Pasini; Siranoush Manoukian; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Henry T Lynch; Jane McLennan; William D Foulkes; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Parviz Ghadirian; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Claudine Isaacs; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Pal Møller; Susan L Neuhausen; Kelly Metcalfe; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Mary Jo Lund; Katrina F Trivers; Peggy L Porter; Ralph J Coates; Brian Leyland-Jones; Otis W Brawley; Elaine W Flagg; Ruth M O'Regan; Sheryl G A Gabram; J William Eley Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-03-07 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Chaya S Moskowitz; Joanne F Chou; Joseph P Neglia; Ann H Partridge; Rebecca M Howell; Lisa R Diller; Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Dana Barnea; Lindsay M Morton; Lucie M Turcotte; Michael A Arnold; Wendy M Leisenring; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger; Tara O Henderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert T Chatterton; Richard E Heinz; Angela J Fought; David Ivancic; Claire Shappell; Subhashini Allu; Susan Gapstur; Denise M Scholtens; Peter H Gann; Seema A Khan Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: Marzana Chowdhury; David Euhus; Maureen O'Donnell; Tracy Onega; Pankaj K Choudhary; Swati Biswas Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Shi-Yi Wang; Jessica B Long; Brigid K Killelea; Suzanne B Evans; Kenneth B Roberts; Andrea Silber; Cary P Gross Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Babette Siebold Saltzman; Kathleen E Malone; Jean A McDougall; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-08-19 Impact factor: 4.872