BACKGROUND: There is an intense interest in the possibility that neighborhood characteristics influence active transportation such as walking or biking. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how a spatial cluster identification method can evaluate the geographic variation of active transportation and identify neighborhoods with unusually high/low levels of active transportation. METHODS: Self-reported walking/biking prevalence, demographic characteristics, street connectivity variables, and neighborhood socioeconomic data were collected from respondents to the 2001 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS; N=10,688) in Los Angeles County (LAC) and San Diego County (SDC). Spatial scan statistics were used to identify clusters of high or low prevalence (with and without age-adjustment) and the quantity of time spent walking and biking. The data, a subset from the 2001 CHIS, were analyzed in 2007-2008. RESULTS: Geographic clusters of significantly high or low prevalence of walking and biking were detected in LAC and SDC. Structural variables such as street connectivity and shorter block lengths are consistently associated with higher levels of active transportation, but associations between active transportation and socioeconomic variables at the individual and neighborhood levels are mixed. Only one cluster with less time spent walking and biking among walkers/bikers was detected in LAC, and this was of borderline significance. Age-adjustment affects the clustering pattern of walking/biking prevalence in LAC, but not in SDC. CONCLUSIONS: The use of spatial scan statistics to identify significant clustering of health behaviors such as active transportation adds to the more traditional regression analysis that examines associations between behavior and environmental factors by identifying specific geographic areas with unusual levels of the behavior independent of predefined administrative units.
BACKGROUND: There is an intense interest in the possibility that neighborhood characteristics influence active transportation such as walking or biking. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how a spatial cluster identification method can evaluate the geographic variation of active transportation and identify neighborhoods with unusually high/low levels of active transportation. METHODS: Self-reported walking/biking prevalence, demographic characteristics, street connectivity variables, and neighborhood socioeconomic data were collected from respondents to the 2001 California Health Interview Survey (CHIS; N=10,688) in Los Angeles County (LAC) and San Diego County (SDC). Spatial scan statistics were used to identify clusters of high or low prevalence (with and without age-adjustment) and the quantity of time spent walking and biking. The data, a subset from the 2001 CHIS, were analyzed in 2007-2008. RESULTS: Geographic clusters of significantly high or low prevalence of walking and biking were detected in LAC and SDC. Structural variables such as street connectivity and shorter block lengths are consistently associated with higher levels of active transportation, but associations between active transportation and socioeconomic variables at the individual and neighborhood levels are mixed. Only one cluster with less time spent walking and biking among walkers/bikers was detected in LAC, and this was of borderline significance. Age-adjustment affects the clustering pattern of walking/biking prevalence in LAC, but not in SDC. CONCLUSIONS: The use of spatial scan statistics to identify significant clustering of health behaviors such as active transportation adds to the more traditional regression analysis that examines associations between behavior and environmental factors by identifying specific geographic areas with unusual levels of the behavior independent of predefined administrative units.
Authors: Terri J Pikora; Billie Giles-Corti; Matthew W Knuiman; Fiona C Bull; Konrad Jamrozik; Rob J Donovan Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Mia A Papas; Anthony J Alberg; Reid Ewing; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Tiffany L Gary; Ann C Klassen Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2007-05-28 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kosuke Tamura; Dustin T Duncan; Jessica Athens; Marc Scott; Michael Rienti; Jared Aldstadt; Laurie M Brotman; Brian Elbel Journal: GeoJournal Date: 2017-07-27
Authors: Liza S Rovniak; James F Sallis; Brian E Saelens; Lawrence D Frank; Simon J Marshall; Gregory J Norman; Terry L Conway; Kelli L Cain; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Gina S Lovasi; Ofira Schwartz-Soicher; Kathryn M Neckerman; Kevin Konty; Bonnie Kerker; James Quinn; Andrew Rundle Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2013-02
Authors: David Berrigan; J Aaron Hipp; Philip M Hurvitz; Peter James; Marta M Jankowska; Jacqueline Kerr; Francine Laden; Tammy Leonard; Robin A McKinnon; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Elizabeth Tarlov; Shannon N Zenk Journal: Ann GIS Date: 2015-03-13
Authors: Vivian W Siu; William E Lambert; Rongwei Fu; Teresa A Hillier; Mark Bosworth; Yvonne L Michael Journal: J Environ Public Health Date: 2012-08-22
Authors: Kosuke Tamura; Robin C Puett; Jaime E Hart; Heather A Starnes; Francine Laden; Philip J Troped Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 3.295