| Literature DB >> 19587794 |
Ilja M Nolte1, Chris Wallace, Stephen J Newhouse, Daryl Waggott, Jingyuan Fu, Nicole Soranzo, Rhian Gwilliam, Panos Deloukas, Irina Savelieva, Dongling Zheng, Chrysoula Dalageorgou, Martin Farrall, Nilesh J Samani, John Connell, Morris Brown, Anna Dominiczak, Mark Lathrop, Eleftheria Zeggini, Louise V Wain, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Mark Eijgelsheim, Kenneth Rice, Paul I W de Bakker, Arne Pfeufer, Serena Sanna, Dan E Arking, Folkert W Asselbergs, Tim D Spector, Nicholas D Carter, Steve Jeffery, Martin Tobin, Mark Caulfield, Harold Snieder, Andrew D Paterson, Patricia B Munroe, Yalda Jamshidi.
Abstract
To identify loci affecting the electrocardiographic QT interval, a measure of cardiac repolarisation associated with risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, we conducted a meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies (GWAS) including 3,558 subjects from the TwinsUK and BRIGHT cohorts in the UK and the DCCT/EDIC cohort from North America. Five loci were significantly associated with QT interval at P<1x10(-6). To validate these findings we performed an in silico comparison with data from two QT consortia: QTSCD (n = 15,842) and QTGEN (n = 13,685). Analysis confirmed the association between common variants near NOS1AP (P = 1.4x10(-83)) and the phospholamban (PLN) gene (P = 1.9x10(-29)). The most associated SNP near NOS1AP (rs12143842) explains 0.82% variance; the SNP near PLN (rs11153730) explains 0.74% variance of QT interval duration. We found no evidence for interaction between these two SNPs (P = 0.99). PLN is a key regulator of cardiac diastolic function and is involved in regulating intracellular calcium cycling, it has only recently been identified as a susceptibility locus for QT interval. These data offer further mechanistic insights into genetic influence on the QT interval which may predispose to life threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19587794 PMCID: PMC2704957 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Study characteristics of the TwinsUK, BRIGHT and DCCT/EDIC cohorts.
| TwinsUK | BRIGHT | DCCT/EDIC | |
| N | 1,048 | 1,392 | 1,118 |
| Age, mean (SD) | 51.8 (12.0) | 56.7 (10.9) | 46.0 (7.0) |
| Sex, n (%) male | 12 (1.1) | 502 (36.0) | 568 (51.0) |
| QT interval, mean (SD) | 400.9 (27.9) | 414.5 (33.8) | 387.6 (29.2) |
|
| 21.8 | 100 | 50.8 |
|
| 3.1 | 0 | 100 |
Systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg or taking anti-hypertensive drugs.
Type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
Figure 1Manhattan plot for QT interval based on GWAS meta-analysis of TwinsUK, BRIGHT, and DCCT/EDIC cohorts.
SNPs are ordered along the chromosomes on the x-axis. The −log10 (P) results are plotted for 2,399,142 SNPs of the meta-analysis of TwinsUK, BRIGHT and DCCT/EDIC cohorts for 3,558 individuals. The red dots indicate SNPs with P<10−6.
Figure 2Quantile-quantile plots of association results of the meta-analysis from TwinsUK, BRIGHT and DCCT/EDIC cohorts.
Based on 2,399,142 SNPs in 3,558 individuals from the combined cohorts. The −log10(P) plot of association test for QT interval is shown for all SNPs (black diamonds) and for all SNPs except those located within 1 Mb of the most significant SNPs of our five associated regions (dark grey) [26]. Genomic Control λ was 1.016 [25]. The lower horizontal line denotes the 95% percentile of the results of all SNPs, values lower than this threshold were used for calculating the λ. The upper line indicates the point from where P-values of the complete dataset deviate from the expected line.
Results of the most significant SNP from the five regions associated with QT interval in GWAS meta-analysis of TwinsUK, BRIGHT and DCCT/EDIC cohorts.
| SNP ID | Cohort | Coded Allele Frequency (%) | HWE (P) | Genotyped | Beta (SE) | R2 (%) | P-value |
| rs12143842, chr 1 | TwinsUK | 24.4 | 0.11 | No | 0.22 (0.053) | 1.76 | 3.2×10−5 |
| coded allele: T | BRIGHT | 26.6 | 0.89 | No | 0.15 (0.046) | 0.83 | 0.0015 |
| non-coded allele: C | DCCT/EDIC | 25.3 | 0.68 | Yes | 0.085 (0.049) | 0.27 | 0.082 |
|
| 25.5 | N/A | N/A | 0.15 (0.028) | 0.82 |
| |
| rs11153730, chr 6 | TwinsUK | 48.4 | 0.024 | No | 0.21 (0.145) | 2.19 | 3.6×10−6 |
| coded allele: C | BRIGHT | 48.1 | 0.45 | No | 0.096 (0.04) | 0.46 | 0.017 |
| non-coded allele: T | DCCT/EDIC | 49 | 0.75 | No | 0.075 (0.042) | 0.28 | 0.076 |
|
| 48.5 | N/A | N/A | 0.12 (0.024) | 0.74 |
| |
| rs885170, chr13 | TwinsUK | 18.7 | 0.28 | No | 0.17 (0.058) | 0.84 | 0.0045 |
| coded allele: G | BRIGHT | 19.7 | 0.41 | No | 0.22 (0.051) | 1.58 | 1.2×10−5 |
| non-coded allele: A | DCCT/EDIC | 17.6 | 0.76 | No | 0.14 (0.057) | 0.55 | 0.016 |
|
| 18.8 | N/A | N/A | 0.18 (0.032) | 0.99 |
| |
| rs6038729, chr20 | TwinsUK | 32.3 | 0.98 | Yes | 0.064 (0.046) | 0.18 | 0.16 |
| coded allele: C | BRIGHT | 30.1 | 0.14 | No | 0.21 (0.044) | 1.87 | 2.1×10−6 |
| non-coded allele: A | DCCT/EDIC | 32.3 | 0.78 | Yes | 0.11 (0.046) | 0.54 | 0.015 |
|
| 31.4 | N/A | N/A | 0.13 (0.026) | 0.73 |
| |
| rs2832357, chr 21 | TwinsUK | 2.7 | 0.77 | Yes | 0.27 (0.16) | 0.37 | 0.088 |
| coded allele: G | BRIGHT | 2.8 | 0.2 | No | 0.49 (0.12) | 1.29 | 5.3×10−5 |
| non-coded allele: A | DCCT/EDIC | 2.6 | 0.21 | Yes | 0.38 (0.13) | 0.71 | 0.0031 |
|
| 2.7 | N/A | N/A | 0.40 (0.076) | 0.82 |
|
HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test; SE: standard error; N/A: not applicable.
Percentage of explained variance.
Results of the five most significant loci from GWAS meta-analysis of TwinsUK, BRIGHT and DCCT/EDIC cohorts and in silico comparison with the QTGEN and QTSCD consortia data.
| SNP | Chr | Position | Flanking genes (distance to SNP in kb) | Coded Allele | Meta-analysis of TwinsUK, BRIGHT and DCCT/EDIC | QTSCD | QTGEN | META |
| rs12143842 | 1 | 160,300,514 |
| Freq T (%) | 26 | 24 | 26 | 25 |
| (−40.2; 5.7) | Beta | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.21 | 0.18 | |||
| P-value | 2.1 10−7 | 1.6 10−35 | 8.1 10−46 |
| ||||
| rs11153730 | 6 | 118,774,215 |
| Freq C (%) | 48 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| (−28.7; intronic; 202.0) | Beta | 0.12 | 0.091 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |||
| P-value | 6.4 10−7 | 5.2 10−16 | 5.3 10−10 |
| ||||
| rs885170 | 13 | 34,095,789 |
| Freq G (%) | 19 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| (−657.1; 318.7) | Beta | 0.18 | −0.011 | −0.0051 | 0.01 | |||
| P-value | 1.8 10−8 | 0.44 | 0.76 |
| ||||
| rs6038729 | 20 | 7,085,757 |
| Freq C (%) | 31 | 32 | 31 | 32 |
| (−367.8; 675.3) | Beta | 0.13 | 0.020 | −0.0042 | 0.023 | |||
| P-value | 6.3 10−7 | 0.085 | 0.76 |
| ||||
| rs2832357 | 21 | 29,785,765 |
| Freq G (%) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| (−129.7; 45.4) | Beta | 0.40 | 0.0075 | 0.022 | 0.053 | |||
| P-value | 2.3 10−7 | 0.82 | 0.58 |
|
Freq: allele frequency.
NCBI Genome build 36.3.
Figure 3Regional association plot for the SLC35F1/C6orf204/PLN locus on chromosome 6.
Shown is the region extending to 500 kb either side of the most associated SNP rs11153730. The SNPs are illustrated on −log10(P) scale as a function of chromosomal position (NCBI build36.3). The sentinel SNP is illustrated in blue. Surrounding SNPs are coloured according to their r2 with rs11153730 (red indicates an r2>0.8, orange an r2 of 0.5–0.8, yellow an r2 of 0.2–0.5 and grey an r2 of less than 0.2).