Literature DB >> 19587497

Crossmatch testing in kidney transplantation: patterns of practice and associations with rejection and graft survival.

Paolo R Salvalaggio1, Ralph J Graff, Brett Pinsky, Mark A Schnitzler, Steven K Takemoto, Thomas E Burroughs, Luiz S Santos, Krista L Lentine.   

Abstract

Methods of crossmatch testing prior to kidney transplantation are not standardized and there are limited large-scale data on the use and outcomes implications of crossmatch modality. Data describing the most sensitive crossmatch modality for crossmatch-negative kidney transplants were drawn from the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network Registry. Within the cohort transplanted in 1999-2005, we identified patient and transplant characteristics predictive of each testing modality by multivariate logistic regression. We assessed associations of crossmatch modality with rejection risk by logistic regression and with graft survival by Cox's hazards analysis. Among 230,995 transplants, use of flow cytometry with T-and B-lymphocytes (T&B FC) increased progressively in 1987-2005. Among the recent transplants performed in 1999-2005 (n=64,320), negative T&B FC crossmatch was associated with 15% lower relative risk of first-year acute rejection (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.89) compared to negative T-antihuman-globulin and B-National Institutes of Health/Wash (T AHG &B) crossmatch. Five-year graft survival after transplant with negative T&B FC (82.6%) was modestly better than after negative T AHG &B (81.4%, P= 0.008) or T AHG crossmatch (81.1%, P 0.0001), but on adjusted analysis was significantly different only among recipients from deceased donors and patients aged > 60 years. Many subgroups for whom negative T&B FC crossmatch predicted lower rejection risk (Caucasians, deceased donor recipients, re-transplants) were not more likely to be crossmatched by this method. We conclude that current practice patterns have not aligned utilization of T&B FC crossmatch with associated benefits. Prospective evaluation of the relationship of crossmatch modality with outcomes is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19587497      PMCID: PMC2750084     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl        ISSN: 1319-2442


  23 in total

1.  Characterization of HLA class I specific antibodies by ELISA using solubilized antigen targets: II. Clinical relevance.

Authors:  A A Zachary; L E Ratner; J A Graziani; D P Lucas; N L Delaney; M S Leffell
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.850

2.  A quality control program for crossmatching procedures for solid organ transplantation. The participating laboratories of the Australasian and South Asian Tissue Typing Association.

Authors:  A J Howden; D C Sayer; G Bennett; L K Smith; F T Christiansen
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.850

3.  Pre-transplant assessment of donor-reactive, HLA-specific antibodies in renal transplantation: contraindication vs. risk.

Authors:  Howard M Gebel; Robert A Bray; Peter Nickerson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Donation after cardiac death: the university of wisconsin experience with renal transplantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Cooper; L Thomas Chin; Nancy R Krieger; Luis A Fernandez; David P Foley; Yolanda T Becker; Jon S Odorico; Stuart J Knechtle; Munci Kalayoglu; Hans W Sollinger; Anthony M D'Alessandro
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Flow cytometry crossmatching as a predictor of acute rejection in sensitized recipients of cadaveric renal transplants.

Authors:  R W O'Rourke; R W Osorio; C E Freise; C D Lou; M R Garovoy; P Bacchetti; N L Ascher; J S Melzer; J P Roberts; P G Stock
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Kidney and pancreas transplantation without a crossmatch in select circumstances--it can be done.

Authors:  A J Matas; A Humar; R Kandaswamy; W D Payne; R W Gruessner; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors.

Authors:  Friedrich K Port; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Robert A Metzger; Dawn M Dykstra; Brenda W Gillespie; Eric W Young; Francis L Delmonico; James J Wynn; Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Philip J Held
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  The importance of anti-HLA-specific antibody strength in monitoring kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  K Mizutani; P Terasaki; E Hamdani; V Esquenazi; A Rosen; J Miller; M Ozawa
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities.

Authors:  Rui Pei; Jar-How Lee; Neng-Jen Shih; Mike Chen; Paul I Terasaki
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Crossmatch tests--an analysis of UNOS data from 1991-2000.

Authors:  Y W Cho; J M Cecka
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  2001
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Crossmatch, Donor-specific Antibody Testing, and Immunosuppression in Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Review.

Authors:  Anushka Das; Timucin Taner; Jim Kim; Juliet Emamaullee
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.385

2.  Successful Renal Transplantation Across HLA Barrier: Report from India.

Authors:  G Aggarwal; A K Tiwari; P Dorwal; R Chauhan; D Arora; R C Dara; V Kher
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2017 May-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.