Literature DB >> 10770424

Flow cytometry crossmatching as a predictor of acute rejection in sensitized recipients of cadaveric renal transplants.

R W O'Rourke1, R W Osorio, C E Freise, C D Lou, M R Garovoy, P Bacchetti, N L Ascher, J S Melzer, J P Roberts, P G Stock.   

Abstract

Flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM) was developed as a more sensitive assay than the standard complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) for the detection of anti-donor antibodies, that mediate hyperacute rejection and graft loss in the early post-transplant period in renal transplant recipients. The role of FCXM in predicting long-term clinical outcome in renal allograft recipients is unclear. This study examines the role of FCXM in predicting long-term clinical outcome in highly sensitized recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. All patients (n = 100) with peak panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels > 30%, who received cadaveric renal transplants between 1/1/'90 and 12/31/'95 at our institution, were divided into FCXM + and FCXM - groups. The incidence of acute rejection was determined for each group during the first yr after transplant. Graft survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 yr, and creatinine levels were also compared between groups. FCXM + patients experienced a higher incidence of acute rejection during the first yr after transplant (69 vs. 45%), and a higher percentage of FCXM + patients had more than one episode of acute rejection during the first yr after transplant (34 vs. 8%) when compared to FCXM - patients. There was no statistically significant difference in 1-, 2-, or 3-yr graft survival between FCXM + and FCXM - patients (76 vs. 83, 62 vs. 80, 62 vs. 72%, respectively). These results suggest that sensitized FCXM + cadaveric renal transplant recipients have a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes in the first yr after transplant. Given the association of multiple rejection episodes with poor long-term allograft survival, FCXM may be a useful predictor of long-term clinical outcome in this sub-group of renal transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10770424     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.140212.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  4 in total

1.  Enhanced de novo alloantibody and antibody-mediated injury in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  E K Page; A J Page; J Kwun; A C Gibby; F Leopardi; J B Jenkins; E A Strobert; M Song; R A Hennigar; N Iwakoshi; S J Knechtle
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  Methodological aspects of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody analysis in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Andrew L Lobashevsky
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-09-24

3.  Crossmatch testing in kidney transplantation: patterns of practice and associations with rejection and graft survival.

Authors:  Paolo R Salvalaggio; Ralph J Graff; Brett Pinsky; Mark A Schnitzler; Steven K Takemoto; Thomas E Burroughs; Luiz S Santos; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2009-07

4.  Prevalence of Clinically Significant anti-HLA Antibodies in Renal Transplant Patients: Single-center Report from North India.

Authors:  Rajni Chauhan; Aseem Kumar Tiwari; Chhavi Rajvanshi; Simmi Mehra; Abhishek Saini; Geet Aggarwal; Shyam Bihari Bansal; Vijay Kher; Shoma Paul Nandi
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.