Literature DB >> 19586654

Urinary prostate cancer 3 test: toward the age of reason?

Virginie Vlaeminck-Guillem1, Alain Ruffion, Jean André, Marian Devonec, Philippe Paparel.   

Abstract

The prostate cancer 3 (PCA3) gene was discovered in 1999, on the basis of differential expression between cancer and noncancerous prostate tissue. Including the first study published in 2003, 11 clinical studies have evaluated its utility for the diagnosis of prostate cancer by measuring the number of PCA3 RNA copies in urine enriched with prostate cells. Although the sensitivity of the PCA3 test was less than that of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), its specificity appeared to be much better, particularly in patients with a previous negative biopsy. Recent studies also have suggested that this test could be used to predict cancer prognosis. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19586654     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.03.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  28 in total

Review 1.  Long non-coding RNAs in gastric cancer: versatile mechanisms and potential for clinical translation.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Yongchao Liu; Guangjian Huang; Peng Cui; Wenhong Zhang; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Additional value of PCA3 density to predict initial prostate biopsy outcome.

Authors:  A Ruffion; P Perrin; M Devonec; D Champetier; M Decaussin; P Paparel; V Vlaeminck-Guillem
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The emerging role of extracellular vesicles as biomarkers for urogenital cancers.

Authors:  Muhammad Nawaz; Giovanni Camussi; Hadi Valadi; Irina Nazarenko; Karin Ekström; Xiaoqin Wang; Simona Principe; Neelam Shah; Naeem M Ashraf; Farah Fatima; Luciano Neder; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Prognostic determinants in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Neil E Martin; Lorelei A Mucci; Massimo Loda; Ronald A Depinho
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches to incorporating external information for the prediction of prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Paul J Newcombe; Brian H Reck; Jielin Sun; Greg T Platek; Claudio Verzilli; A Karim Kader; Seong-Tae Kim; Fang-Chi Hsu; Zheng Zhang; S Lilly Zheng; Vincent E Mooser; Lynn D Condreay; Colin F Spraggs; John C Whittaker; Roger S Rittmaster; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 Score Does Not Predict for Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy or for Progression-free Survival in Clinically Localized, Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Darlene Veruttipong; Jonathan W Said; Robert E Reiter; Michael L Steinberg; Christopher R King; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 7.  Long Noncoding RNAs as Innovative Urinary Diagnostic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Giulia Brisotto; Roberto Guerrieri; Francesca Colizzi; Agostino Steffan; Barbara Montico; Elisabetta Fratta
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 8.  Urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer: a review.

Authors:  Daphne Hessels; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  PSA and beyond: alternative prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Sharanjot Saini
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 10.  PCA3 in the detection and management of early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Filella; Laura Foj; Montserrat Milà; Josep M Augé; Rafael Molina; Wladimiro Jiménez
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.