Literature DB >> 19586253

Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage.

Scott D Gronlund1, Curt A Carlson2, Sarah B Dailey1, Charles A Goodsell1.   

Abstract

A growing movement in the United States and around the world involves promoting the advantages of conducting an eyewitness lineup in a sequential manner. We conducted a large study (N = 2,529) that included 24 comparisons of sequential versus simultaneous lineups. A liberal statistical criterion revealed only 2 significant sequential lineup advantages and 3 significant simultaneous advantages. Both sequential advantages occurred when the good photograph of the guilty suspect or either innocent suspect was in the fifth position in the sequential lineup; all 3 simultaneous advantages occurred when the poorer quality photograph of the guilty suspect or either innocent suspect was in the second position. Adjusting the statistical criterion to control for the multiple tests (.05/24) revealed no significant sequential advantages. Moreover, despite finding more conservative overall choosing for the sequential lineup, no support was found for the proposal that a sequential advantage was due to that conservative criterion shift. Unless lineups with particular characteristics predominate in the real world, there appears to be no strong preference for conducting lineups in either a sequential or a simultaneous manner. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19586253     DOI: 10.1037/a0015082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  10 in total

1.  Why eyewitnesses fail.

Authors:  Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  sdtlu: An R package for the signal detection analysis of eyewitness lineup data.

Authors:  Andrew L Cohen; Jeffrey J Starns; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02

3.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

4.  Relative judgment theory and the mediation of facial recognition: Implications for theories of eyewitness identification.

Authors:  Ryan M McAdoo; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-05

5.  The Effects of Alcohol Intoxication on Accuracy and the Confidence-Accuracy Relationship in Photographic Simultaneous Line-ups.

Authors:  Heather D Flowe; Melissa F Colloff; Nilda Karoğlu; Katarzyna Zelek; Hannah Ryder; Joyce E Humphries; Melanie K T Takarangi
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-06-27

6.  Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.

Authors:  Andrew L Cohen; Jeffrey J Starns; Caren M Rotello; Andrea M Cataldo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-13

7.  A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data.

Authors:  Nicola Marie Menne; Kristina Winter; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  The impact of fillers on lineup performance.

Authors:  Stacy A Wetmore; Ryan M McAdoo; Scott D Gronlund; Jeffrey S Neuschatz
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-11-22

9.  The impact of sleep on eyewitness identifications.

Authors:  D P Morgan; J Tamminen; T M Seale-Carlisle; L Mickes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?

Authors:  Matthew Kaesler; John C Dunn; Keith Ransom; Carolyn Semmler
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.