Literature DB >> 19585084

Knowing when to give up: early-rejection stratagems in ligand docking.

Gwyn Skone1, Irina Voiculescu, Stephen Cameron.   

Abstract

Virtual screening is an important resource in the drug discovery community, of which protein-ligand docking is a significant part. Much software has been developed for this purpose, largely by biochemists and those in related disciplines, who pursue ever more accurate representations of molecular interactions. The resulting tools, however, are very processor-intensive. This paper describes some initial results from a project to review computational chemistry techniques for docking from a non-chemistry standpoint. An abstract blueprint for protein-ligand docking using empirical scoring functions is suggested, and this is used to discuss potential improvements. By introducing computer science tactics such as lazy function evaluation, dramatic increases to throughput can and have been realized using a real-world docking program. Naturally, they can be extended to any system that approximately corresponds to the architecture outlined.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19585084     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-009-9296-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  13 in total

Review 1.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.

Authors:  Inbal Halperin; Buyong Ma; Haim Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-06-01

2.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Ligand binding: functional site location, similarity and docking.

Authors:  Stephen J Campbell; Nicola D Gold; Richard M Jackson; David R Westhead
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 4.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.

Authors:  R D Taylor; P J Jewsbury; J W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications.

Authors:  Douglas B Kitchen; Hélène Decornez; John R Furr; Jürgen Bajorath
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.

Authors:  Gregory L Warren; C Webster Andrews; Anna-Maria Capelli; Brian Clarke; Judith LaLonde; Millard H Lambert; Mika Lindvall; Neysa Nevins; Simon F Semus; Stefan Senger; Giovanna Tedesco; Ian D Wall; James M Woolven; Catherine E Peishoff; Martha S Head
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Comparison of topological, shape, and docking methods in virtual screening.

Authors:  Georgia B McGaughey; Robert P Sheridan; Christopher I Bayly; J Chris Culberson; Constantine Kreatsoulas; Stacey Lindsley; Vladimir Maiorov; Jean-Francois Truchon; Wendy D Cornell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming.

Authors:  D K Gehlhaar; G M Verkhivker; P A Rejto; C J Sherman; D B Fogel; L J Fogel; S T Freer
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1995-05

9.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure.

Authors:  H J Böhm
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Frog: a FRee Online druG 3D conformation generator.

Authors:  T Bohme Leite; D Gomes; M A Miteva; J Chomilier; B O Villoutreix; P Tufféry
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.