Literature DB >> 12001221

Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions.

Inbal Halperin1, Buyong Ma, Haim Wolfson, Ruth Nussinov.   

Abstract

The docking field has come of age. The time is ripe to present the principles of docking, reviewing the current state of the field. Two reasons are largely responsible for the maturity of the computational docking area. First, the early optimism that the very presence of the "correct" native conformation within the list of predicted docked conformations signals a near solution to the docking problem, has been replaced by the stark realization of the extreme difficulty of the next scoring/ranking step. Second, in the last couple of years more realistic approaches to handling molecular flexibility in docking schemes have emerged. As in folding, these derive from concepts abstracted from statistical mechanics, namely, populations. Docking and folding are interrelated. From the purely physical standpoint, binding and folding are analogous processes, with similar underlying principles. Computationally, the tools developed for docking will be tremendously useful for folding. For large, multidomain proteins, domain docking is probably the only rational way, mimicking the hierarchical nature of protein folding. The complexity of the problem is huge. Here we divide the computational docking problem into its two separate components. As in folding, solving the docking problem involves efficient search (and matching) algorithms, which cover the relevant conformational space, and selective scoring functions, which are both efficient and effectively discriminate between native and non-native solutions. It is universally recognized that docking of drugs is immensely important. However, protein-protein docking is equally so, relating to recognition, cellular pathways, and macromolecular assemblies. Proteins function when they are bound to other molecules. Consequently, we present the review from both the computational and the biological points of view. Although large, it covers only partially the extensive body of literature, relating to small (drug) and to large protein-protein molecule docking, to rigid and to flexible. Unfortunately, when reviewing these, a major difficulty in assessing the results is the non-uniformity in the formats in which they are presented in the literature. Consequently, we further propose a way to rectify it here. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12001221     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  250 in total

Review 1.  Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: a matter of pre-existing populations.

Authors:  Buyong Ma; Maxim Shatsky; Haim J Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Surface-histogram: a new shape descriptor for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Shengyin Gu; Patrice Koehl; Joel Hass; Nina Amenta
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-09

3.  Multiple structural alignment by secondary structures: algorithm and applications.

Authors:  Oranit Dror; Hadar Benyamini; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces.

Authors:  Buyong Ma; Tal Elkayam; Haim Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility.

Authors:  Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Biochemical filtering of a protein-protein docking simulation identifies the structure of a complex between a recombinant antibody fragment and alpha-bungarotoxin.

Authors:  Luisa Bracci; Alessandro Pini; Andrea Bernini; Barbara Lelli; Claudia Ricci; Maria Scarselli; Neri Niccolai; Paolo Neri
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  SiteLight: binding-site prediction using phage display libraries.

Authors:  Inbal Halperin; Haim Wolfson; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  The role of geometric complementarity in secondary structure packing: a systematic docking study.

Authors:  Sulin Jiang; Andrei Tovchigrechko; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  HPr kinase/phosphorylase, the sensor enzyme of catabolite repression in Gram-positive bacteria: structural aspects of the enzyme and the complex with its protein substrate.

Authors:  Sylvie Nessler; Sonia Fieulaine; Sandrine Poncet; Anne Galinier; Josef Deutscher; Joël Janin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Rigid Body Energy Minimization on Manifolds for Molecular Docking.

Authors:  Hanieh Mirzaei; Dmitri Beglov; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis; Sandor Vajda; Pirooz Vakili; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.